Loading…
Investigation of Surgical Site Infection Outbreak Among Neurosurgical Patients
Background: The infection control service of a private hospital in Belo Horizonte, Brazil, performs continuous surveillance of surgical patients according to the CDC NHSN protocols. In a routine analysis of the neurosurgical service, we identified a subtle increase in the incidence of surgical site...
Saved in:
Published in: | Infection control and hospital epidemiology 2020-10, Vol.41 (S1), p.s306-s306 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background:
The infection control service of a private hospital in Belo Horizonte, Brazil, performs continuous surveillance of surgical patients according to the CDC NHSN protocols. In a routine analysis of the neurosurgical service, we identified a subtle increase in the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI): in 5 months (June–October 2018), 6 patients developed an SSI. From January 2017 until May 2018, there were no cases of infection in neurosurgery, which led us to suspect an outbreak.
Methods:
A cohort study was used to investigate the factors associated with risk of SSI. We investigated the following variables: ASA score, number of hospital admissions, age, preoperative hospital length of stay, duration of surgery, wound class, general anesthesia, emergency, trauma, prosthesis, surgical procedures, surgeon. Furthermore, 9 key steps were followed to investigate the outbreak: case definition (step 1), search for new SSI cases (step 2); confirmation of the outbreak (step 3); analysis of SSI cases by London Protocol (step 4); analysis of the cohort data (step 5); inspections in the surgical ward (step 6); qualitative and quantitative reports sent to the neurosurgical departments (step 7); continuing with active surveillance (stage 8); announcement of research findings (step 9).
Results:
The outbreak was confirmed: SSI incidence in the pre-epidemic period (January–May 2018) was 0 of 218 (0%); in the epidemic period (June–October 2018), SSI incidence was 6 of 94 (6.4%) (
P
< .001). We identified 3 SSI etiologic agents: 2
Klebsiella pneumoniae
, 2
S. aureus
, and 1
Serratia marcescens
. It was unlikely that there was a common source for the outbreak. We identified the following risk factors: second or third hospital admissions (RR, 3.7;
P
= .041), and preoperative hospital length of stay: SSI patients (4.3±5.7 days) versus control patients (0.7 ± 2.1 days) (
P
= .048). None of the surgeons presented an SSI rate significantly different from each other. We used the London protocol to identify antibiotic prophylaxis failures in most cases.
Conclusions:
New cases of infections can be prevented if the length of preoperative hospital stay becomes as short as possible and, most importantly, if antibiotic prophylaxis does not fail.
Funding:
None
Disclosures:
None |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0899-823X 1559-6834 |
DOI: | 10.1017/ice.2020.892 |