Loading…

Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials Testing the Effects of Yoga with Youth

Objectives The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of yoga with youth. Methods Selection of studies was based on the following inclusion criteria: RCT design, publication in a peer-reviewed journal in English, participants between ages 5...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Mindfulness 2020-06, Vol.11 (6), p.1336-1353
Main Authors: Miller, Shari, Mendelson, Tamar, Lee-Winn, Angela, Dyer, Natalie L., Khalsa, Sat Bir S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objectives The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of yoga with youth. Methods Selection of studies was based on the following inclusion criteria: RCT design, publication in a peer-reviewed journal in English, participants between ages 5 and 18, and assessment of an intervention in which yoga was the primary component. Results Our search of seven databases yielded 39 RCTs that met inclusion criteria. Studies were conducted in seven countries, with the majority in the USA. Most studies were conducted with predominantly White samples and in school settings. Studies were variable in the duration, frequency, and number of yoga program sessions. Outcomes included a range of constructs in three domains: psychological/behavioral, cognitive, and physiological/physical functioning. In all but five studies, yoga improved outcomes in at least one of these three domains. Results indicate growing evidence that yoga is a promising intervention for children and youth. Conclusions Recommendations for future research include specification of testable theoretical models with hypothesized intervention core components and mechanisms of action, assessment of intervention mediators and moderators, routine monitoring and reporting of factors associated with program implementation, use of common validated outcome measures, and reporting of null or iatrogenic intervention effects.
ISSN:1868-8527
1868-8535
DOI:10.1007/s12671-019-01230-7