Anthropology at sea: Displacement as ethnographic praxis

Ethnography remains central as a form and location of knowledge production in anthropology. Given this weaving together of ethnography and anthropology, to ask, what good is anthropology?, is also to ask, what good is ethnography? Taking apart two of the guiding metaphors for ethnography—fieldwork a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American ethnologist 2024-02, Vol.51 (1), p.40-46
Main Author: Dua, Jatin
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Anthropology
Ethnography
Fieldwork
Legitimacy
Metaphor
Navigation
Weaving
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Ethnography remains central as a form and location of knowledge production in anthropology. Given this weaving together of ethnography and anthropology, to ask, what good is anthropology?, is also to ask, what good is ethnography? Taking apart two of the guiding metaphors for ethnography—fieldwork and immersion—allows us to explore a distinction that undergirds them: that between land and sea. While the field in fieldwork has been heavily theorized, immersion often appears as a metaphor to signal anthropological legitimacy. But for those who are at sea, immersion is not just metaphor but materiality. For objects to be immersed at sea requires an understanding of displacement and buoyancy. Beyond dislocation, displacement produces the buoyancy essential to navigation. Thinking through this principle allows for an ethnographic practice attuned not only to the frictions of contemporary life but also to how displacement moves forward, in unequal and haphazard ways, but forward, nonetheless.
ISSN:0094-0496
1548-1425
DOI:10.1111/amet.13238