Becoming malleable: How orienting to disability, communication, and the senses further commits anthropology to its moral project

Drawing on anthropological scholarship on the senses, embodiment, and communication, we argue for a capacity‐based anthropology that takes account of human variation in all domains of everyday life, including “the field” and “the anthropology seminar.” Such an approach allows us to consider the ways...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American ethnologist 2024-02, Vol.51 (1), p.78-83
Main Authors: Friedner, Michele, Wolf‐Meyer, Matthew
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Anthropology
Everyday life
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Drawing on anthropological scholarship on the senses, embodiment, and communication, we argue for a capacity‐based anthropology that takes account of human variation in all domains of everyday life, including “the field” and “the anthropology seminar.” Such an approach allows us to consider the ways that humans are differently malleable, and we stress that enacting malleability, when possible, is a kind of ethical engagement. Attending to malleability—and its limits—allows us to imagine and produce a more sensitive anthropology. A more sensitive anthropology would expand the discipline's understanding of who counts as an anthropologist and what counts as anthropological praxis.
ISSN:0094-0496
1548-1425
DOI:10.1111/amet.13239