Tradeoffs may counteract effects of telecommunication towers on osprey nesting

The number of telecommunication towers (TCTs) throughout the United States has and continues to increase exponentially. Increased TCT placement has been implicated in local population increases in platform nesting birds such as ospreys (Pandion haliaetus). However, osprey use of artificial structure...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Human-wildlife interactions 2023-04, Vol.17 (1), p.1-9
Main Authors: Barnes, Gage R, Slankard, Kate G, Hewlett, John B, Barracq, Andrea K
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Animal reproduction
Economic impact
Foraging behavior
Management decisions
Nesting
Nesting behavior
Nests
Parks & recreation areas
Pesticides
Predation
Productivity
Radiation
Safety management
Success
Towers
Vegetation
Wildlife conservation
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The number of telecommunication towers (TCTs) throughout the United States has and continues to increase exponentially. Increased TCT placement has been implicated in local population increases in platform nesting birds such as ospreys (Pandion haliaetus). However, osprey use of artificial structures can cause conflicts with humans because of economic costs and risks to human safety. Managers require better information regarding the effect of artificial nesting surfaces, such as TCTS, on osprey reproduction to make informed decisions regarding species conservation and to mitigate potential conflicts. The objective of our study was to evaluate the influence of TCTs on osprey productivity and adult nesting behaviors. From March to July 2019, we monitored 30 osprey nests located in western Kentucky, USA, on TCTs (n = 11), navigation channel markers (NCMs; n = 10), and natural surfaces (NATs; n = 9). We found no differences in nest success, productivity, or the proportion of male ospreys perched at the nest between surface types. Nests on NCMs received 1.9-2.1 times more fish than nests on NATs and TCTs, respectively. Moreover, NCMs experienced 5.4-8.0 times more disturbances per hour compared to NATs and TCTs, respectively. Our data suggest ospreys nesting on TCTs are productive contributors to local populations. We recommend deterrence of osprey nesting should be focused on locations that are unsafe for ospreys and/or pose insurmountable problems for communication infrastructure.
ISSN:2155-3858
2155-3874
DOI:10.26077/65DB-25DE