Education Prototyping: a Methodological Device for Technical Democracy

The potential of applying a ‘technical democracy’ (Callon et al.  2009 ) to the context of sociotechnical controversies in education is the focus of this paper. This process reflects an emergent 'thought collective' (Fleck 1979 ) whose common interests, yet diverse expertise, are articulat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Postdigital science and education 2024-03, Vol.6 (1), p.342-359
Main Authors: Swist, Teresa, Gulson, Kalervo N., Thompson, Greg
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Artificial intelligence
Aspiration
Automation
Chatbots
Collaboration
Decision making
Democracy
Democratization
Education
Educational Philosophy
Educational Research
Educational Technology
Experiments
Opportunities
Organizational Change
Original Articles
Product development
Professional Autonomy
Prototypes
Researchers
Teaching Methods
Technology
Technology and Digital Education
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The potential of applying a ‘technical democracy’ (Callon et al.  2009 ) to the context of sociotechnical controversies in education is the focus of this paper. This process reflects an emergent 'thought collective' (Fleck 1979 ) whose common interests, yet diverse expertise, are articulated through provisional objects and infrastructure for collective and experimental knowledge production. The technique of ‘prototyping’ was then deployed for a design experiment to: first, slow down, or suspend, existing power relations of co-evolving technologies and methodologies and, second, to accelerate, or expand, new possibilities and configurations for democratisation. Education prototyping is then introduced, with the intent to co-produce pluralistic spaces that expose challenges and test possibilities. Key aspects include the following: (i) prototyping dynamics: problematization and prefiguration; and, (ii) prototyping practices: spanning the temporal, methodological, relational, material, and spatial. These aspects were tested in the context of a research project exploring automated essay scoring in Australian schools. While always situated and partial, we argue that prototyping offers a unique device to interrupt and experiment with the politics of collaboratively researching increasingly networked and commercialised technologies across education and society.
ISSN:2524-485X
2524-4868
DOI:10.1007/s42438-023-00426-4