Solidarity with atypical workers? Survey evidence from the General Motors versus United Auto Workers strike in 2019

In this article, we examine the extent to which typical workers act in solidarity with atypical workers. We collected unique survey data from United Auto Workers striking against General Motors in 2019 during the strike and after the ratification vote. Although solidarity was generally high, we do f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:British journal of industrial relations 2024-03, Vol.62 (1), p.72-97
Main Authors: Lima Aranzaes, Carla, Lyhne Ibsen, Christian, DeOrtentiis, Philip S., Tapia, Maite
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Agreements
Atypical
Polls & surveys
Prone
Ratification
Strikes
Workers
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In this article, we examine the extent to which typical workers act in solidarity with atypical workers. We collected unique survey data from United Auto Workers striking against General Motors in 2019 during the strike and after the ratification vote. Although solidarity was generally high, we do find that typical workers with longer tenure exhibit less solidarity with atypical workers and that they are more prone to be on strike due to material reasons. In the second survey, after workers had voted on the proposed contract, we find that typical workers were more prone to vote yes to the agreement for self‐interested, material reasons and that solidarity with atypical workers had a significant, negative effect on the probability of voting yes to the agreement. Our findings support notions that insiders strike and vote according to self‐interests. We discuss these findings in light of the insider/outsider, dualization and union strategy literature.
ISSN:0007-1080
1467-8543
DOI:10.1111/bjir.12763