Loading…
Reactive Distillation for Methanol Synthesis: Parametric Studies and Optimization Using a Non-polar Solvent
Reactive distillation (RD) for methanol synthesis offers the advantage of process integration by combining reaction and separation in a single equipment and utilization of the reaction exotherm in the separation. The feasibility of RD for methanol synthesis using a polar solvent has already been dem...
Saved in:
Published in: | Process integration and optimization for sustainability 2020-12, Vol.4 (4), p.325-342 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Reactive distillation (RD) for methanol synthesis offers the advantage of process integration by combining reaction and separation in a single equipment and utilization of the reaction exotherm in the separation. The feasibility of RD for methanol synthesis using a polar solvent has already been demonstrated in an earlier work by Ghosh and Seethamraju (Chem Eng Process - Process Intensif, 145:107673,
2019
) using a polar solvent. Since reaction and distillation occur simultaneously in the same column, the effect of operating and design parameters of the column is crucial for its performance. In this paper, the effects of different operating and design parameters have been presented using squalane—a non-polar solvent. Performance of RD for methanol synthesis was evaluated in terms of conversion of reactants, productivities of methanol and water, and purities of the product streams. Operating parameters like reflux ratio, solvent flow rate, and feed temperatures, and design parameters like addition of reactive and non-reactive stages were found to affect the column performance significantly. Based on the results from the parametric studies, optimization of the RD column was performed to maximize the methanol production in the liquid distillate. Conversions of CO and H
2
were found to increase respectively from 52.9% and 36.8% in the base case to 78.4% (48% increase) and 54% (47% increase) in the optimum cases. Methanol productivity also increased by 47% relative to the base case with enhancement in separation of the produced methanol. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2509-4238 2509-4246 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s41660-020-00122-x |