Loading…
Remember Kabul? Reputation, strategic contexts, and American credibility after the Afghanistan withdrawal
We examine how a great power's past behavior toward an informal security partner affects the broader credibility of its security commitments, focusing on the implications of America's dramatic troop withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021 as perceived by the U.S., South Korean, and Chinese pub...
Saved in:
Published in: | Contemporary security policy 2024-04, Vol.45 (2), p.265-297 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-4a345c2517e0587b2c6f0aa8adfff7e8ba4bde8a3e0637b0bfc3e57d34e104753 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-4a345c2517e0587b2c6f0aa8adfff7e8ba4bde8a3e0637b0bfc3e57d34e104753 |
container_end_page | 297 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 265 |
container_title | Contemporary security policy |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Kim, D.G. Byun, Joshua Ko, Jiyoung |
description | We examine how a great power's past behavior toward an informal security partner affects the broader credibility of its security commitments, focusing on the implications of America's dramatic troop withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021 as perceived by the U.S., South Korean, and Chinese publics. Against conventional wisdom, we show that knowledge about a great power's decision to abandon an informal partner in one region of the globe can help increase confidence about its alliance commitments elsewhere. Our survey experiments identify a striking disjuncture: Although Americans tend to believe that the abandonment decision in Afghanistan will hurt their country's credibility in East Asia, no such effect is found in South Korea and China. In fact, East Asian respondents who are reminded of the Afghanistan withdrawal become more confident about American security commitments when alerted to the possibility that this decision will help Washington to concentrate additional military capabilities in their region. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/13523260.2023.2253406 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2957633968</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2957633968</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-4a345c2517e0587b2c6f0aa8adfff7e8ba4bde8a3e0637b0bfc3e57d34e104753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhQdRsFZ_ghBw26mZZDJJV1qKLywIRdfhTuamTZlHTVJq_71TWreu7ll851z4kuQ2o-OMKnqfccE4K-iYUcbHjAme0-IsGWQy56mSRX7e555JD9BlchXCmlJGlaCDxC2wwaZET96h3NYPZIGbbYTounZEQvQQcekMMV0b8SeGEYG2ItMGvTPQEuOxcqWrXdwTsLFfiSskU7tcQetC7Imdi6vKww7q6-TCQh3w5nSHydfz0-fsNZ1_vLzNpvPUcK5imgPPhWEik0iFkiUzhaUACiprrURVQl5WqIAjLbgsaWkNRyErnmNGcyn4MLk77m58973FEPW62_q2f6nZRMiC80mhekocKeO7EDxavfGuAb_XGdUHq_rPqj5Y1Serfe_x2HOt7XwDu87XlY6wrztvPbTGBc3_n_gFt_1_wQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2957633968</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Remember Kabul? Reputation, strategic contexts, and American credibility after the Afghanistan withdrawal</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Kim, D.G. ; Byun, Joshua ; Ko, Jiyoung</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, D.G. ; Byun, Joshua ; Ko, Jiyoung</creatorcontrib><description>We examine how a great power's past behavior toward an informal security partner affects the broader credibility of its security commitments, focusing on the implications of America's dramatic troop withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021 as perceived by the U.S., South Korean, and Chinese publics. Against conventional wisdom, we show that knowledge about a great power's decision to abandon an informal partner in one region of the globe can help increase confidence about its alliance commitments elsewhere. Our survey experiments identify a striking disjuncture: Although Americans tend to believe that the abandonment decision in Afghanistan will hurt their country's credibility in East Asia, no such effect is found in South Korea and China. In fact, East Asian respondents who are reminded of the Afghanistan withdrawal become more confident about American security commitments when alerted to the possibility that this decision will help Washington to concentrate additional military capabilities in their region.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1352-3260</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1743-8764</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/13523260.2023.2253406</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Afghanistan ; Afghanistan War ; China ; Credibility ; Decisions ; Experiments ; Military withdrawals ; Power ; Regions ; Reputation ; Respondents ; Security ; South Korea ; United States ; Wisdom</subject><ispartof>Contemporary security policy, 2024-04, Vol.45 (2), p.265-297</ispartof><rights>2023 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2023</rights><rights>2023 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-4a345c2517e0587b2c6f0aa8adfff7e8ba4bde8a3e0637b0bfc3e57d34e104753</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-4a345c2517e0587b2c6f0aa8adfff7e8ba4bde8a3e0637b0bfc3e57d34e104753</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5792-9369 ; 0000-0001-7133-0750 ; 0000-0001-5912-2828</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27866,27924,27925,33223</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, D.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byun, Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ko, Jiyoung</creatorcontrib><title>Remember Kabul? Reputation, strategic contexts, and American credibility after the Afghanistan withdrawal</title><title>Contemporary security policy</title><description>We examine how a great power's past behavior toward an informal security partner affects the broader credibility of its security commitments, focusing on the implications of America's dramatic troop withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021 as perceived by the U.S., South Korean, and Chinese publics. Against conventional wisdom, we show that knowledge about a great power's decision to abandon an informal partner in one region of the globe can help increase confidence about its alliance commitments elsewhere. Our survey experiments identify a striking disjuncture: Although Americans tend to believe that the abandonment decision in Afghanistan will hurt their country's credibility in East Asia, no such effect is found in South Korea and China. In fact, East Asian respondents who are reminded of the Afghanistan withdrawal become more confident about American security commitments when alerted to the possibility that this decision will help Washington to concentrate additional military capabilities in their region.</description><subject>Afghanistan</subject><subject>Afghanistan War</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Credibility</subject><subject>Decisions</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Military withdrawals</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Regions</subject><subject>Reputation</subject><subject>Respondents</subject><subject>Security</subject><subject>South Korea</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Wisdom</subject><issn>1352-3260</issn><issn>1743-8764</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhQdRsFZ_ghBw26mZZDJJV1qKLywIRdfhTuamTZlHTVJq_71TWreu7ll851z4kuQ2o-OMKnqfccE4K-iYUcbHjAme0-IsGWQy56mSRX7e555JD9BlchXCmlJGlaCDxC2wwaZET96h3NYPZIGbbYTounZEQvQQcekMMV0b8SeGEYG2ItMGvTPQEuOxcqWrXdwTsLFfiSskU7tcQetC7Imdi6vKww7q6-TCQh3w5nSHydfz0-fsNZ1_vLzNpvPUcK5imgPPhWEik0iFkiUzhaUACiprrURVQl5WqIAjLbgsaWkNRyErnmNGcyn4MLk77m58973FEPW62_q2f6nZRMiC80mhekocKeO7EDxavfGuAb_XGdUHq_rPqj5Y1Serfe_x2HOt7XwDu87XlY6wrztvPbTGBc3_n_gFt_1_wQ</recordid><startdate>20240402</startdate><enddate>20240402</enddate><creator>Kim, D.G.</creator><creator>Byun, Joshua</creator><creator>Ko, Jiyoung</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5792-9369</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7133-0750</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5912-2828</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240402</creationdate><title>Remember Kabul? Reputation, strategic contexts, and American credibility after the Afghanistan withdrawal</title><author>Kim, D.G. ; Byun, Joshua ; Ko, Jiyoung</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-4a345c2517e0587b2c6f0aa8adfff7e8ba4bde8a3e0637b0bfc3e57d34e104753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Afghanistan</topic><topic>Afghanistan War</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Credibility</topic><topic>Decisions</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Military withdrawals</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Regions</topic><topic>Reputation</topic><topic>Respondents</topic><topic>Security</topic><topic>South Korea</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Wisdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, D.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byun, Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ko, Jiyoung</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Contemporary security policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, D.G.</au><au>Byun, Joshua</au><au>Ko, Jiyoung</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Remember Kabul? Reputation, strategic contexts, and American credibility after the Afghanistan withdrawal</atitle><jtitle>Contemporary security policy</jtitle><date>2024-04-02</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>265</spage><epage>297</epage><pages>265-297</pages><issn>1352-3260</issn><eissn>1743-8764</eissn><abstract>We examine how a great power's past behavior toward an informal security partner affects the broader credibility of its security commitments, focusing on the implications of America's dramatic troop withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021 as perceived by the U.S., South Korean, and Chinese publics. Against conventional wisdom, we show that knowledge about a great power's decision to abandon an informal partner in one region of the globe can help increase confidence about its alliance commitments elsewhere. Our survey experiments identify a striking disjuncture: Although Americans tend to believe that the abandonment decision in Afghanistan will hurt their country's credibility in East Asia, no such effect is found in South Korea and China. In fact, East Asian respondents who are reminded of the Afghanistan withdrawal become more confident about American security commitments when alerted to the possibility that this decision will help Washington to concentrate additional military capabilities in their region.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/13523260.2023.2253406</doi><tpages>33</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5792-9369</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7133-0750</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5912-2828</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1352-3260 |
ispartof | Contemporary security policy, 2024-04, Vol.45 (2), p.265-297 |
issn | 1352-3260 1743-8764 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2957633968 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection |
subjects | Afghanistan Afghanistan War China Credibility Decisions Experiments Military withdrawals Power Regions Reputation Respondents Security South Korea United States Wisdom |
title | Remember Kabul? Reputation, strategic contexts, and American credibility after the Afghanistan withdrawal |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T14%3A24%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Remember%20Kabul?%20Reputation,%20strategic%20contexts,%20and%20American%20credibility%20after%20the%20Afghanistan%20withdrawal&rft.jtitle=Contemporary%20security%20policy&rft.au=Kim,%20D.G.&rft.date=2024-04-02&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=265&rft.epage=297&rft.pages=265-297&rft.issn=1352-3260&rft.eissn=1743-8764&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/13523260.2023.2253406&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2957633968%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-4a345c2517e0587b2c6f0aa8adfff7e8ba4bde8a3e0637b0bfc3e57d34e104753%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2957633968&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |