Loading…

Remember Kabul? Reputation, strategic contexts, and American credibility after the Afghanistan withdrawal

We examine how a great power's past behavior toward an informal security partner affects the broader credibility of its security commitments, focusing on the implications of America's dramatic troop withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021 as perceived by the U.S., South Korean, and Chinese pub...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Contemporary security policy 2024-04, Vol.45 (2), p.265-297
Main Authors: Kim, D.G., Byun, Joshua, Ko, Jiyoung
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-4a345c2517e0587b2c6f0aa8adfff7e8ba4bde8a3e0637b0bfc3e57d34e104753
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-4a345c2517e0587b2c6f0aa8adfff7e8ba4bde8a3e0637b0bfc3e57d34e104753
container_end_page 297
container_issue 2
container_start_page 265
container_title Contemporary security policy
container_volume 45
creator Kim, D.G.
Byun, Joshua
Ko, Jiyoung
description We examine how a great power's past behavior toward an informal security partner affects the broader credibility of its security commitments, focusing on the implications of America's dramatic troop withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021 as perceived by the U.S., South Korean, and Chinese publics. Against conventional wisdom, we show that knowledge about a great power's decision to abandon an informal partner in one region of the globe can help increase confidence about its alliance commitments elsewhere. Our survey experiments identify a striking disjuncture: Although Americans tend to believe that the abandonment decision in Afghanistan will hurt their country's credibility in East Asia, no such effect is found in South Korea and China. In fact, East Asian respondents who are reminded of the Afghanistan withdrawal become more confident about American security commitments when alerted to the possibility that this decision will help Washington to concentrate additional military capabilities in their region.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/13523260.2023.2253406
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2957633968</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2957633968</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-4a345c2517e0587b2c6f0aa8adfff7e8ba4bde8a3e0637b0bfc3e57d34e104753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhQdRsFZ_ghBw26mZZDJJV1qKLywIRdfhTuamTZlHTVJq_71TWreu7ll851z4kuQ2o-OMKnqfccE4K-iYUcbHjAme0-IsGWQy56mSRX7e555JD9BlchXCmlJGlaCDxC2wwaZET96h3NYPZIGbbYTounZEQvQQcekMMV0b8SeGEYG2ItMGvTPQEuOxcqWrXdwTsLFfiSskU7tcQetC7Imdi6vKww7q6-TCQh3w5nSHydfz0-fsNZ1_vLzNpvPUcK5imgPPhWEik0iFkiUzhaUACiprrURVQl5WqIAjLbgsaWkNRyErnmNGcyn4MLk77m58973FEPW62_q2f6nZRMiC80mhekocKeO7EDxavfGuAb_XGdUHq_rPqj5Y1Serfe_x2HOt7XwDu87XlY6wrztvPbTGBc3_n_gFt_1_wQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2957633968</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Remember Kabul? Reputation, strategic contexts, and American credibility after the Afghanistan withdrawal</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Kim, D.G. ; Byun, Joshua ; Ko, Jiyoung</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, D.G. ; Byun, Joshua ; Ko, Jiyoung</creatorcontrib><description>We examine how a great power's past behavior toward an informal security partner affects the broader credibility of its security commitments, focusing on the implications of America's dramatic troop withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021 as perceived by the U.S., South Korean, and Chinese publics. Against conventional wisdom, we show that knowledge about a great power's decision to abandon an informal partner in one region of the globe can help increase confidence about its alliance commitments elsewhere. Our survey experiments identify a striking disjuncture: Although Americans tend to believe that the abandonment decision in Afghanistan will hurt their country's credibility in East Asia, no such effect is found in South Korea and China. In fact, East Asian respondents who are reminded of the Afghanistan withdrawal become more confident about American security commitments when alerted to the possibility that this decision will help Washington to concentrate additional military capabilities in their region.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1352-3260</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1743-8764</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/13523260.2023.2253406</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Afghanistan ; Afghanistan War ; China ; Credibility ; Decisions ; Experiments ; Military withdrawals ; Power ; Regions ; Reputation ; Respondents ; Security ; South Korea ; United States ; Wisdom</subject><ispartof>Contemporary security policy, 2024-04, Vol.45 (2), p.265-297</ispartof><rights>2023 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group 2023</rights><rights>2023 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-4a345c2517e0587b2c6f0aa8adfff7e8ba4bde8a3e0637b0bfc3e57d34e104753</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-4a345c2517e0587b2c6f0aa8adfff7e8ba4bde8a3e0637b0bfc3e57d34e104753</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5792-9369 ; 0000-0001-7133-0750 ; 0000-0001-5912-2828</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27866,27924,27925,33223</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, D.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byun, Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ko, Jiyoung</creatorcontrib><title>Remember Kabul? Reputation, strategic contexts, and American credibility after the Afghanistan withdrawal</title><title>Contemporary security policy</title><description>We examine how a great power's past behavior toward an informal security partner affects the broader credibility of its security commitments, focusing on the implications of America's dramatic troop withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021 as perceived by the U.S., South Korean, and Chinese publics. Against conventional wisdom, we show that knowledge about a great power's decision to abandon an informal partner in one region of the globe can help increase confidence about its alliance commitments elsewhere. Our survey experiments identify a striking disjuncture: Although Americans tend to believe that the abandonment decision in Afghanistan will hurt their country's credibility in East Asia, no such effect is found in South Korea and China. In fact, East Asian respondents who are reminded of the Afghanistan withdrawal become more confident about American security commitments when alerted to the possibility that this decision will help Washington to concentrate additional military capabilities in their region.</description><subject>Afghanistan</subject><subject>Afghanistan War</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Credibility</subject><subject>Decisions</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Military withdrawals</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Regions</subject><subject>Reputation</subject><subject>Respondents</subject><subject>Security</subject><subject>South Korea</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Wisdom</subject><issn>1352-3260</issn><issn>1743-8764</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhQdRsFZ_ghBw26mZZDJJV1qKLywIRdfhTuamTZlHTVJq_71TWreu7ll851z4kuQ2o-OMKnqfccE4K-iYUcbHjAme0-IsGWQy56mSRX7e555JD9BlchXCmlJGlaCDxC2wwaZET96h3NYPZIGbbYTounZEQvQQcekMMV0b8SeGEYG2ItMGvTPQEuOxcqWrXdwTsLFfiSskU7tcQetC7Imdi6vKww7q6-TCQh3w5nSHydfz0-fsNZ1_vLzNpvPUcK5imgPPhWEik0iFkiUzhaUACiprrURVQl5WqIAjLbgsaWkNRyErnmNGcyn4MLk77m58973FEPW62_q2f6nZRMiC80mhekocKeO7EDxavfGuAb_XGdUHq_rPqj5Y1Serfe_x2HOt7XwDu87XlY6wrztvPbTGBc3_n_gFt_1_wQ</recordid><startdate>20240402</startdate><enddate>20240402</enddate><creator>Kim, D.G.</creator><creator>Byun, Joshua</creator><creator>Ko, Jiyoung</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5792-9369</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7133-0750</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5912-2828</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240402</creationdate><title>Remember Kabul? Reputation, strategic contexts, and American credibility after the Afghanistan withdrawal</title><author>Kim, D.G. ; Byun, Joshua ; Ko, Jiyoung</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-4a345c2517e0587b2c6f0aa8adfff7e8ba4bde8a3e0637b0bfc3e57d34e104753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Afghanistan</topic><topic>Afghanistan War</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Credibility</topic><topic>Decisions</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Military withdrawals</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Regions</topic><topic>Reputation</topic><topic>Respondents</topic><topic>Security</topic><topic>South Korea</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Wisdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, D.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byun, Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ko, Jiyoung</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Contemporary security policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, D.G.</au><au>Byun, Joshua</au><au>Ko, Jiyoung</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Remember Kabul? Reputation, strategic contexts, and American credibility after the Afghanistan withdrawal</atitle><jtitle>Contemporary security policy</jtitle><date>2024-04-02</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>265</spage><epage>297</epage><pages>265-297</pages><issn>1352-3260</issn><eissn>1743-8764</eissn><abstract>We examine how a great power's past behavior toward an informal security partner affects the broader credibility of its security commitments, focusing on the implications of America's dramatic troop withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021 as perceived by the U.S., South Korean, and Chinese publics. Against conventional wisdom, we show that knowledge about a great power's decision to abandon an informal partner in one region of the globe can help increase confidence about its alliance commitments elsewhere. Our survey experiments identify a striking disjuncture: Although Americans tend to believe that the abandonment decision in Afghanistan will hurt their country's credibility in East Asia, no such effect is found in South Korea and China. In fact, East Asian respondents who are reminded of the Afghanistan withdrawal become more confident about American security commitments when alerted to the possibility that this decision will help Washington to concentrate additional military capabilities in their region.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/13523260.2023.2253406</doi><tpages>33</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5792-9369</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7133-0750</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5912-2828</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1352-3260
ispartof Contemporary security policy, 2024-04, Vol.45 (2), p.265-297
issn 1352-3260
1743-8764
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2957633968
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection
subjects Afghanistan
Afghanistan War
China
Credibility
Decisions
Experiments
Military withdrawals
Power
Regions
Reputation
Respondents
Security
South Korea
United States
Wisdom
title Remember Kabul? Reputation, strategic contexts, and American credibility after the Afghanistan withdrawal
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T14%3A24%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Remember%20Kabul?%20Reputation,%20strategic%20contexts,%20and%20American%20credibility%20after%20the%20Afghanistan%20withdrawal&rft.jtitle=Contemporary%20security%20policy&rft.au=Kim,%20D.G.&rft.date=2024-04-02&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=265&rft.epage=297&rft.pages=265-297&rft.issn=1352-3260&rft.eissn=1743-8764&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/13523260.2023.2253406&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2957633968%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-4a345c2517e0587b2c6f0aa8adfff7e8ba4bde8a3e0637b0bfc3e57d34e104753%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2957633968&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true