Loading…
Fitting Distances by Tree Metrics Minimizing the Total Error within a Constant Factor
We consider the numerical taxonomy problem of fitting a positive distance function \({\mathcal {D}:{S\choose 2}\rightarrow \mathbb {R}_{\gt 0}}\) by a tree metric. We want a tree T with positive edge weights and including S among the vertices so that their distances in T match those in \(\mathcal {D...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of the ACM 2024-04, Vol.71 (2), p.1-41, Article 10 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | We consider the numerical taxonomy problem of fitting a positive distance function \({\mathcal {D}:{S\choose 2}\rightarrow \mathbb {R}_{\gt 0}}\) by a tree metric. We want a tree T with positive edge weights and including S among the vertices so that their distances in T match those in \(\mathcal {D}\) . A nice application is in evolutionary biology where the tree T aims to approximate thebranching process leading to the observed distances in \(\mathcal {D}\) [Cavalli-Sforza and Edwards 1967]. We consider the total error, that is, the sum of distance errors over all pairs of points. We present a deterministic polynomial time algorithm minimizing the total error within a constant factor. We can do this both for general trees and for the special case of ultrametrics with a root having the same distance to all vertices in S.The problems are APX-hard, so a constant factor is the best we can hope for in polynomial time. The best previous approximation factor was O((log n)(log log n)) by Ailon and Charikar [2005], who wrote “determining whether an O(1) approximation can be obtained is a fascinating question.” |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0004-5411 1557-735X |
DOI: | 10.1145/3639453 |