Observer Perspective Memories May Be a Distinct Type of Memory Distortion

Variations in visual perspective in autobiographical memory recall exemplify memory as a malleable and dynamic construct. Research examining variations in vantage point during autobiographical memory retrieval has identified a distinction between first-person (recalling a memory through one's o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of applied research in memory and cognition 2024-03, Vol.13 (1), p.26-29
Main Authors: Siedlecki, Karen L., Falzarano, Francesca B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Autobiographical Memory
Errors
False Memory
Human
Linear Perspective
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Variations in visual perspective in autobiographical memory recall exemplify memory as a malleable and dynamic construct. Research examining variations in vantage point during autobiographical memory retrieval has identified a distinction between first-person (recalling a memory through one's own eyes) and third-person (recalling a memory as an observer) perspectives. In her target article, St. Jacques (2024) reviews the lack of consensus regarding whether memories retrieved from a third-person perspective are considered false memories versus memory distortions. In this commentary, we begin with a brief discussion highlighting the distinction between false and distorted memories. We then present findings derived from secondary data analyses examining the relationship between visual perspective and memory distortions on two different "false memory" measures in (N = 112) participants. Study findings underscore that recalling autobiographical memories with an observer perspective may be a distinct type of memory distortion.
ISSN:2211-3681
2211-369X
DOI:10.1037/mac0000165