On the efficacy of surface-attached air bubbles as thermal insulators for pressure-driven internal flow

• Published in: Journal of fluid mechanics 2024-05, Vol.987, Article A6
• Main Authors: Shojaee, S. Amir, Flynn, M.R.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adiabatic; Air bubbles; Boundary conditions; Bubbles; Drag; Drag reduction; Flow rates; Fluid flow; Heat; Heat flux; Heat transfer; Hydrophobic surfaces; Insulating materials; Insulators; Internal flow; Isothermal flow; JFM Papers; Mass flow rate; Mathematical analysis; Microchannels; Pipe flow; Ridges; Simulation; Surface temperature; Temperature differences; Temperature gradients; Thermal insulation; Thickness; Water temperature
• ISSN: 0022-1120; 1469-7645
• DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2024.382

There exists much research examining the role of surface-attached air bubbles in drag reduction. Most of this literature considers isothermal flows and so ignores temperature differences, e.g. with the solid boundary. Here, we relax this assumption and ask whether surface-attached air bubbles may prove useful as thermal insulators, e.g. when the solid temperature differs from that of the cargo liquid (water). Theoretical and numerical solutions, e.g. for the variation of the Nusselt number with bubble thickness, are presented for cases characterized by a uniform surface heat flux (USF). We examine channel and pipe flow geometries, and consider instances where the net mass flow rate within the (continuous) air bubble is zero or non-zero. When the thermal boundary condition is changed to uniform surface temperature (UST), our analysis limits attention to numerical solutions. We identify and discuss a remarkable connection between the drag reduction problem and the USF thermal insulation problem: the proportional change of water temperature with bubble thickness is identical to the proportional change of drag. Also, and although our analysis is conducted in the ‘perfect plastron limit’, we can, e.g. by evaluating hydrodynamic and thermal slip lengths, contrast our work against related studies where heat transfer occurs through the ridges or pillars that affix the air layer in place. This comparison indicates that the oft-applied adiabatic interface assumption may prove restrictive in some regions of the parameter space. We conclude by examining the implications of our work in the context of UST micro-channels, which are relevant to various lab-on-a-chip technologies.