What happens when private general practitioners receive incentivisation offers from pharmaceutical sales representatives? A qualitative study in Pakistan

• Published in: Journal of health services research & policy 2024-07, Vol.29 (3), p.173-181
• Main Authors: Noor, Muhammad Naveed, Rahman-Shepherd, Afifah, Khan, Sabeen Sharif, Hasan, Rumina, Siddiqui, Amna Rehana, Azam, Iqbal, Bhutto, Faiza, Isani, Afshan Khurshid, Siddiqi, Sameen, Khan, Robyna Irshad, Shakoor, Sadia, Khan, Mishal
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Companies; Distortion; Ethics; Family physicians; Interviews; Pharmaceutical industry; Prescribing; Profit maximization; Sales
• ISSN: 1355-8196; 1758-1060
• DOI: 10.1177/13558196241230853

Objectives Pharmaceutical incentivisation of physicians for profit maximisation is a well-documented health system challenge. This study examined general practitioners’ (GPs) reactions to pharmaceutical incentivisation offers in one region in Pakistan. Methods We used the Standardised Pharmaceutical Sales Representative (SPSR) method and qualitative interviews with GPs. SPSRs were field researchers representing mock pharmaceutical companies who recorded their observations of 267 GPs’ responses to pharmaceutical incentivisation offers. We triangulated SPSR data using qualitative interviews with a subset of the same GPs to gather information about how they interpreted different interaction outcomes. Results We found four major outcomes for GPs being offered incentives by pharmaceutical companies for prescribing medications. GPs might agree to make incentivisation deals, reject incentivisation offers, disallow PSRs to access them, or remain indeterminate with no clear indication of acceptance or rejection of incentivisation offers. GPs rejecting SPSRs’ incentivisation offers indicated having active commitments to other pharmaceutical companies, not being able to work with unheard-of companies, and asking SPSRs to return later. Conclusions The GP-pharmaceutical sales representative interaction that centres on profit-maximisation is complex as offers to engage in prescribing for mutual financial benefit are not taken up immediately. The SPSR method helps understand the extent of distortion of practices impacted by incentivisation. Such an understanding can support the development of strategies to control unethical behaviours.