'R (on the application of W80) v Director General of the Independent Office of Police Conduct': Landmark ruling or business as usual?

On 5 July 2023 the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in 'R (on the application of W80) v Director General of the Independent Office for Police Conduct'. The issue before the Court was which test should be applied in assessing whether officers' use of force amounts to misconduct;...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Modern law review 2024-07, Vol.87 (4), p.1019-1030
Main Author: Torrible, Clare
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Accountability
Behavior
Criminal law
Jurisprudence
Misconduct
Police
Police misconduct
Regulation
Self-defense (Law)
Supreme courts
Tests
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:On 5 July 2023 the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in 'R (on the application of W80) v Director General of the Independent Office for Police Conduct'. The issue before the Court was which test should be applied in assessing whether officers' use of force amounts to misconduct; the criminal law test for self-defence as the Divisional Court found; the test set out in the 'Police Conduct Regulations 2012' (ie that officers should only use force when it is 'necessary, proportionate and reasonable in all the circumstances') as the Court of Appeal held; or the civil law test for self-defence which the Supreme Court ultimately decided was the correct approach. The Court's affirmation that the criminal law test is inconsistent with the purposes of the police conduct system is to be welcomed. However, this case note argues that their Lordships' reasoning in other regards was unconvincing and obscured deeper issues concerning police accountability which the recent Casey Review confirms need to be more openly addressed.
ISSN:0026-7961
1468-2230
DOI:10.1111/1468-2230.12885