Loading…

Multimodal vision-based human action recognition using deep learning: a review

Vision-based Human Action Recognition (HAR) is a hot topic in computer vision. Recently, deep-based HAR has shown promising results. HAR using a single data modality is a common approach; however, the fusion of different data sources essentially conveys complementary information and improves the res...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Artificial intelligence review 2024-06, Vol.57 (7), p.178, Article 178
Main Authors: Shafizadegan, Fatemeh, Naghsh-Nilchi, Ahmad R., Shabaninia, Elham
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Vision-based Human Action Recognition (HAR) is a hot topic in computer vision. Recently, deep-based HAR has shown promising results. HAR using a single data modality is a common approach; however, the fusion of different data sources essentially conveys complementary information and improves the results. This paper comprehensively reviews deep-based HAR methods using multiple visual data modalities. The main contribution of this paper is categorizing existing methods into four levels, which provides an in-depth and comparable analysis of approaches in various aspects. So, at the first level, proposed methods are categorized based on the employed modalities. At the second level, methods categorized in the first level are classified based on the employment of complete modalities or working with missing modalities at the test time. At the third level, complete and missing modality branches are categorized based on existing approaches. Finally, similar frameworks in the third category are grouped together. In addition, a comprehensive comparison is provided for publicly available benchmark datasets, which helps to compare and choose suitable datasets for a task or to develop new datasets. This paper also compares the performance of state-of-the-art methods on benchmark datasets. The review concludes by highlighting several future directions.
ISSN:1573-7462
0269-2821
1573-7462
DOI:10.1007/s10462-024-10730-5