Publication Output and Trends of LIS Faculty Teaching Health-Related Courses: Connecting Research, Teaching, and Practice

• Published in: Journal of education for library and information science 2024-07, Vol.65 (3), p.282-298
• Main Authors: Charbonneau, Deborah H., Vardell, Emily, T. Huber, Jeffrey, Shapiro, Robert M., Kean, Emily B.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Accreditation; Author productivity; Authorship; Bibliometrics; Citations; Collaboration; Core curriculum; Course Descriptions; Credibility; Graduate students; Librarians; Library and information science; Library associations; Library science; Publication output; Scholarly communication; Scholarly publishing; Science programs; Teaching; Tenure; Trends
• ISSN: 0748-5786; 2328-2967
• DOI: 10.3138/jelis-2023-0004

The publication output of Library and Information Science (LIS) faculty teaching health courses has not been analyzed. The purpose of this bibliometric analysis was to examine publication patterns of full-time LIS faculty that teach health-related courses for library science programs in the United States and Canada. Full-time LIS faculty teaching health-related courses in American Library Association (ALA)–accredited programs were identified by searching course listings, faculty profiles, and syllabi from ALA-accredited school websites and contacting deans and directors of schools. The 29 LIS faculty that were identified and met the inclusion criteria were contacted via email in September 2021 and invited to voluntarily share their curricula vitae (CVs) for analysis. A total of 16 respondents provided their CVs, representing a 55% response rate. This was supplemented by locating five more CVs publicly available online. The final sample of LIS faculty was 21, and the bibliometrics analysis was based on a total of 716 publications published from 2011 to 2021 and reported on the CVs from this group of scholars. This analysis resulted in the identification of several patterns. Journal articles were the most common publication type, followed by conference proceedings. Joint authorship patterns were more common than solo authors, highlighting the collaborative nature of research. While faculty published in a range of LIS and interdisciplinary journals, highly cited papers appeared in health specialty journals. This study represents the first step in examining the research output for this under-explored community of LIS scholars. These findings may be of interest to promotion and tenure committees, newer tenure-track faculty, and doctoral students exploring academic careers in this specialized area.