Calibrating Bayesian Tension Statistics using Neural Ratio Estimation

When fits of the same physical model to two different datasets disagree, we call this tension. Several apparent tensions in cosmology have occupied researchers in recent years, and a number of different metrics have been proposed to quantify tension. Many of these metrics suffer from limiting assump...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:arXiv.org 2024-07
Main Authors: Bevins, Harry T J, Handley, William J, Gessey-Jones, Thomas
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Bayesian analysis
Calibration
Cosmology
Dark energy
Sky surveys (astronomy)
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:When fits of the same physical model to two different datasets disagree, we call this tension. Several apparent tensions in cosmology have occupied researchers in recent years, and a number of different metrics have been proposed to quantify tension. Many of these metrics suffer from limiting assumptions, and correctly calibrating these is essential if we want to successfully determine whether discrepancies are significant. A commonly used metric of tension is the evidence ratio R. The statistic has been widely adopted by the community as a Bayesian way of quantifying tensions, however, it has a non-trivial dependence on the prior that is not always accounted for properly. We show that this can be calibrated out effectively with Neural Ratio Estimation. We demonstrate our proposed calibration technique with an analytic example, a toy example inspired by 21-cm cosmology, and with observations of the Baryon Acoustic Oscillations from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument~(DESI) and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey~(SDSS). We find no significant tension between DESI and SDSS.
ISSN:2331-8422