A capabilitarian behavioral economics: what behavioral economics can learn from the capability approach

Behavioral economics (BE) accounts for how people actually behave has proven to be very influential in multiple domains. Its insights have dislodged settled assumptions and put forward an improved understanding of human beings and their agency. Although it challenges the conventional approach, advan...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International review of economics 2024-09, Vol.71 (3), p.667-690
Main Author: Garces-Velastegui, Pablo
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Behavioral economics
Economic Policy
Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods
Economics
Economics and Finance
Expected utility
History of Economic Thought/Methodology
Human agency
Law and Economics
Quality of life
Quality of Life Research
Realism
Research Article
Social Policy
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Behavioral economics (BE) accounts for how people actually behave has proven to be very influential in multiple domains. Its insights have dislodged settled assumptions and put forward an improved understanding of human beings and their agency. Although it challenges the conventional approach, advanced by rational choice theory (RCT), because it also formally builds on it, BE shares some of RCT’s advantages as well as its shortcomings. One the one hand, it shares an important focus on freedom. On the other, it is limited to self-interest as the main motivation for human action. The latter is a limitation since human experience is much richer than that. To complement BE’s limitation, this paper suggests Amartya Sen’s Capability Approach (CA). This framework places humans and their quality of life at the locus of attention for the assessment of social states. To do so, it challenges RCT in a more fundamental way and it provides a richer account of human agency, which includes both self-regarding as well as other-regarding motivations. This combination enriches BE’s realism as well as practicality.
ISSN:1865-1704
1863-4613
DOI:10.1007/s12232-024-00457-8