Loading…

Estimation of Oil Reservoir Transmissivity and Storativity Fields Using a Radial Basis Function Network Based on Inverse Problem Solving

In the oil industry, there is a noticeable trend towards using proxy models to simulate various levels of complexity in order to make operational predictions. In particular, machine learning techniques are being actively developed in the context of the digitalization and automation of production pro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Lobachevskii journal of mathematics 2024-05, Vol.45 (5), p.2067-2075
Main Authors: Kosyakov, V. P., Legostaev, D. Yu
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In the oil industry, there is a noticeable trend towards using proxy models to simulate various levels of complexity in order to make operational predictions. In particular, machine learning techniques are being actively developed in the context of the digitalization and automation of production processes. This paper proposes a method for combining a physically relevant fluid flow model with machine learning techniques to address the challenges of history-matching and prediction. The approach is demonstrated using synthetic oil reservoir models. The synthetic model has significant zonal inhomogeneities in the permeability and storativity fields. The simplified single-phase flow through a porous medium model was used for the proposed approach. This model was matched to the historical values of the development parameters by restoring the fields of the reservoir parameters. Properties fields were reconstructed using a radial basis functions network and a fully connected linear layer. Based on the reconstructed field, interwell connectivity coefficients were calculated, which corresponded qualitatively and quantitatively to the true interwell connectivity coefficients. The predictive characteristics of the proposed approach were evaluated by split the historical dataset into training and test time intervals.
ISSN:1995-0802
1818-9962
DOI:10.1134/S199508022460225X