Loading…

Limestone impact on properties, microstructure and CO2 emissions of waste glass-activated blast furnace slag cements

Utilizing industrial and urban solid wastes is crucial for developing low-carbon cements. This study proposes a novel method to integrate recycled glass and blast furnace slag (BFS) into alkali-activated cements. It also investigates the influence of pulverized limestone (LSP), as a readily availabl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Materials and structures 2024-11, Vol.57 (9), Article 194
Main Authors: Aragón-Gijón, R. I., Rodríguez-Morales, J., Díaz-Guillén, J. A., Escalante-García, J. I., Burciaga-Díaz, O.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Utilizing industrial and urban solid wastes is crucial for developing low-carbon cements. This study proposes a novel method to integrate recycled glass and blast furnace slag (BFS) into alkali-activated cements. It also investigates the influence of pulverized limestone (LSP), as a readily available cost-efficient partial replacement for BFS. The activators were alternative solid sodium silicates (SSWG), prepared by thermochemical treatment of soda lime silica waste glass in NaOH solutions. SSWG had moduli (Ms) SiO 2 /Na 2 O = 1 and 1.5 and were added at 6 and 8%wt. Na 2 O relative to the mass of BFS + LSP. After 3 years, pastes of 100% BFS at 20 °C yielded the highest compressive strength of 78 MPa, while incorporating 50–75% LSP resulted in 61–42 MPa, depending on the Ms and %Na 2 O. Microstructural analysis via XRD, thermal analysis, SEM, and 27 Al and 29 Si NMR, indicated the formation of cementitious products like C–S–H, C–(A)–S–H, hydrotalcite, natron, gaylussite and pyrssonite. LSP increased the chain length in C–(A)–S–H-type products and affected the Al uptake by a seeding effect. The eco-efficiency analysis showed that the studied cements emit 45–74% less kgCO 2 .eq per ton than Portland cement.
ISSN:1359-5997
1871-6873
DOI:10.1617/s11527-024-02469-w