Loading…

Review on functionalized metal–organic framework as potential candidate for carbon control technologies for climate change: current status and future prospective

The regular increase in carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) concentration in the atmosphere is one of the major environmental issues nowadays. In this essence, establishing some promising stratagem including CO 2 capture, storage, and utilization (CCSU) is one of the options to alleviate CO 2 emissions from the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clean technologies and environmental policy 2024-10, Vol.26 (10), p.3227-3251
Main Authors: Kaur, Gagandeep, Bhardwaj, Himanshi, Kamal, Sharma, Aarti, Sud, Dhiraj
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The regular increase in carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) concentration in the atmosphere is one of the major environmental issues nowadays. In this essence, establishing some promising stratagem including CO 2 capture, storage, and utilization (CCSU) is one of the options to alleviate CO 2 emissions from the energy zone. CCSUs are promising techniques to capture human-generated greenhouse gases (GHGs) by controlling their release into the atmosphere. The key aspect triggers significant developments in novice materials to perform the separations. In this regard, the burgeoning class of superb porous materials (Metal–Organic Frameworks, MOFs), aiming to solve this worldwide issue, is mainly emphasized. MOFs are widely explored in carbon dioxide capturing techniques owing to their exceptional features such as crystallinity, tunable functionality, high surface area, high porosity, and superior design flexibility. The influence of functionalization, such as amine, hydroxyl, carboxylate, sulfone, and nitro, onto the surfaces of MOFs on the CO 2 capture performance was also extensively overviewed. Moreover, this article provides comprehensive investigations emphasizing the different methodologies adopted for CO 2 capture. Graphical abstract
ISSN:1618-954X
1618-9558
DOI:10.1007/s10098-024-02783-5