Deep Convolutional Backbone Comparison for Automated PET Image Quality Assessment

• Published in: IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences 2024-11, Vol.8 (8), p.893-901
• Main Authors: Hopson, Jessica B., Flaus, Anthime, McGinnity, Colm J., Neji, Radhouene, Reader, Andrew J., Hammers, Alexander
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Accuracy; Automation; Convolutional neural networks; Convolutional neural networks (CNNs); deep learning; Image processing; Image quality; Image reconstruction; Medical imaging; Neuroimaging; Parameterization; Patients; Pattern recognition; Positron emission; Positron emission tomography; Quality assessment; Quality control; Task analysis; Testing time; Training; transfer learning; Two dimensional analysis
• ISSN: 2469-7311; 2469-7303
• DOI: 10.1109/TRPMS.2024.3436697

Pretraining deep convolutional network mappings using natural images helps with medical imaging analysis tasks; this is important given the limited number of clinically annotated medical images. Many 2-D pretrained backbone networks, however, are currently available. This work compared 18 different backbones from 5 architecture groups (pretrained on ImageNet) for the task of assessing [18F]FDG brain positron emission tomography (PET) image quality (reconstructed at seven simulated doses), based on three clinical image quality metrics (global quality rating, pattern recognition, and diagnostic confidence). Using 2-D randomly sampled patches, up to eight patients (at three dose levels each) were used for training, with three separate patient datasets used for testing. Each backbone was trained five times with the same training and validation sets, and with six cross-folds. Training only the final fully connected layer (with ~6000-20000 trainable parameters) achieved a test mean-absolute-error (MAE) of ~0.5 (which was within the intrinsic uncertainty of clinical scoring). To compare "classical" and over-parameterized regimes, the pretrained weights of the last 40% of the network layers were then unfrozen. The MAE fell below 0.5 for 14 out of the 18 backbones assessed, including two that previously failed to train. Generally, backbones with residual units (e.g., DenseNets and ResNetV2s), were suited to this task, in terms of achieving the lowest MAE at test time (~0.45-0.5). This proof-of-concept study shows that over-parameterization may also be important for automated PET image quality assessments.