Loading…
Assessment of Midline Shift in Postdecompressive Craniectomy Patients in Neurocritical Care: Comparison between Transcranial Ultrasonography and Computerized Tomography
Background: Monitoring and evaluation of intracranial structures remain a fundamental element in the neurointensive care unit. Most used technique to monitor progression is the use of computed tomography (CT) in intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) or stroke. Rapid assessment of brain pathology can be made...
Saved in:
Published in: | Neurology India 2023-11, Vol.71 (6), p.1167-1171 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background: Monitoring and evaluation of intracranial structures remain a fundamental element in the neurointensive care unit. Most used technique to monitor progression is the use of computed tomography (CT) in intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) or stroke. Rapid assessment of brain pathology can be made using CT to analyze the midline shift (MLS), hematoma expansion, and ventricular size, but transferring a patient who is intubated is time and resource-consuming task. Ultrasonography is a noninvasive technique, portable, and has the possibility of fast interpretation. Aims and Objectives: To measure the brain MLS in decompressive craniectomy patients using transcranial ultrasonography (TCS) and compare the correlation of these results with CT scan measurements of MLS in the same patient. Materials and Methods: Patients who have undergone decompressive craniectomy due to various reasons like ICH, traumatic brain injury, etc., and have a MLS. Trans cranial ultrasonography was assessed by a single consultant (Neuro Critical Care Intensivist) who was blinded for the CT scan measurement. CT scan measurement of MLS was assessed by a neuroradiologist using standard guidelines, who was blinded for the TCS results of MLS. The finding of a MLS >0.5 cm in the CT scan was considered a significant MLS. Results: A total of 31 patients were recruited for the study. MLS measured using CT was 0.91 ± 0.67 cm. MLS via TCS was 0.91 ± 0.66 cm. A significant MLS via TCS was found in 77.4%. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated between CT-MLS and TCS MLS and obtained the value of ICC as 0.996, indicating an almost perfect agreement. Conclusion: Patients after decompressive craniectomy may present as an ideal candidate to visualize intracerebral anatomy with a high resolution. TCS might be considered as an alternative to CT to measure MLS in decompressive craniectomy patients. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0028-3886 1998-4022 |
DOI: | 10.4103/0028-3886.391386 |