So many controls; so little control: The case of Isaac Henderson, Navy Agent at New York, 1861-4

The experience of one man, Isaac Henderson, provides the lens through which this study examines the operation during the Civil War of the federal expenditure control system of the USA. This system’s requisitioning, disbursing and auditing activities cannot be disentangled from the patronage system a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Accounting history 2010-05, Vol.15 (2), p.173-198
Main Author: Mayer-Sommer, Alan P.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
American Civil War
Armed forces
Auditing
Civil war
Comptrollers
Cost control
Defense spending
Disbursements
Expenditures
Federal employees
Government aid
Government spending
Henderson, Isaac
Patronage
Political appointments
Profits
Studies
Treasury operations
Wages & salaries
War
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The experience of one man, Isaac Henderson, provides the lens through which this study examines the operation during the Civil War of the federal expenditure control system of the USA. This system’s requisitioning, disbursing and auditing activities cannot be disentangled from the patronage system and profiteering that inevitably accompany war. Surging activity levels brought on by the war only aggravated the existing weaknesses. Rigidities, redundancies and formalities within the Treasury Department delayed disbursement processing and the subsequent auditing of those disbursements. Clerks who approved disbursements also audited the same disbursements. The focus on appropriation accounting — rather than on information for planning and control purposes — reflected the view that controls existed primarily to assure Congress and the public that money was spent in conformity with laws and regulations. Improper charges were sometimes intentionally placed against appropriations with available balances. Thus the most significant contribution of the federal expenditure control system may well have been to help legitimize wartime spending to Congress and the American people.
ISSN:1032-3732
1749-3374
DOI:10.1177/1032373209359324