Loading…
An ideological agenda for history
[...]the Standards' lessons on the war's effects focused on women in the war effort, the internment of the Nisei, the anti-Hispanic "zoot suit" riots, and the contributions of African, Mexican, and Native Americans. [...]it did no such thing, but it persuaded me that the patrioti...
Saved in:
Published in: | Academic questions 1999-03, Vol.12 (1), p.29-35 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | [...]the Standards' lessons on the war's effects focused on women in the war effort, the internment of the Nisei, the anti-Hispanic "zoot suit" riots, and the contributions of African, Mexican, and Native Americans. [...]it did no such thing, but it persuaded me that the patriotic myth that Bonevac, Cantor, McDougall, and Patai 33 supposedly dominated frontier historiography is itself a myth. [...]during the 1980s, my colleagues and I at Berkeley were merely bemused when certain faculty turned to postmodernism, deconstruction, and radical feminism and founded journals devoted to such topics as "representations of female genitalia in Victorian Britain." According to William H. McNeill, such changes are inevitable in any successful "empire" by dint of its own growing need for labor and its own powers of attraction to migratory peoples abroad. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0895-4852 1936-4709 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s12129-998-1041-8 |