Angular estimation

In one study, 10 Ss estimated the directional trend (heading) of simulated radar trials, using different response modes; rotary switch adjustment permitted better accuracy than numerical estimation. Varying the displayed length of the simulated trials from -516 to 1½ inches had no apparent effect on...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of applied psychology 1962-08, Vol.46 (4), p.240-246
Main Author: Smith, Sidney L
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Differential Diagnosis
Estimation
Human
Response Bias
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In one study, 10 Ss estimated the directional trend (heading) of simulated radar trials, using different response modes; rotary switch adjustment permitted better accuracy than numerical estimation. Varying the displayed length of the simulated trials from -516 to 1½ inches had no apparent effect on estimation accuracy. 5 civilian Ss proved more accurate than 5 airmen. In a 2nd study, 20 Ss estimated the angular position of lines varying in length from |18 to 1 inch, using equipment which permitted switch adjustment and numerical estimation only to the nearest 10 degrees. Results were the same as before. In addition, this report notes differences in estimation accuracy and bias related to the actual angle of displayed lines over a 360-degree range, as well as biasing effects of right- vs. left-handed switch adjustment.
ISSN:0021-9010
1939-1854
DOI:10.1037/h0044445