Loading…

How Do You Know an Act When You See One?: A Response to Devins (1992)

Applying the distinction between self-efficacy and outcome expectations to achieve an unambiguous classification of any given belief seems more difficult than Devins (1992) indicates. Haaga and Stewart note the persistence of confusion about this distinction and hypothesize that its source is the di...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of consulting and clinical psychology 1992-02, Vol.60 (1), p.32-33
Main Authors: Haaga, David A. F, Stewart, Bonnie L
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Applying the distinction between self-efficacy and outcome expectations to achieve an unambiguous classification of any given belief seems more difficult than Devins (1992) indicates. Haaga and Stewart note the persistence of confusion about this distinction and hypothesize that its source is the difficulty of devising a generally applicable procedure for discriminating acts from nonacts.
ISSN:0022-006X
1939-2117
DOI:10.1037/0022-006X.60.1.32