Loading…
How Do You Know an Act When You See One?: A Response to Devins (1992)
Applying the distinction between self-efficacy and outcome expectations to achieve an unambiguous classification of any given belief seems more difficult than Devins (1992) indicates. Haaga and Stewart note the persistence of confusion about this distinction and hypothesize that its source is the di...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of consulting and clinical psychology 1992-02, Vol.60 (1), p.32-33 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Applying the distinction between self-efficacy and outcome expectations to achieve an unambiguous classification of any given belief seems more difficult than
Devins (1992)
indicates. Haaga and Stewart note the persistence of confusion about this distinction and hypothesize that its source is the difficulty of devising a generally applicable procedure for discriminating acts from nonacts. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-006X 1939-2117 |
DOI: | 10.1037/0022-006X.60.1.32 |