Loading…
Critical Incidents in Clinical Supervision and in Supervisor Supervision: Assessing Supervisory Issues
In this naturalistic study, Loganbill, Hardy, and Delworth's (1982) and Sansbury's (1982) propositions regarding supervision issues were applied to the supervision of supervisors in training and to counselor supervision and then tested. The doctoral-student participants consisted of beginn...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of counseling psychology 1991-07, Vol.38 (3), p.342-349 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | In this naturalistic study,
Loganbill, Hardy, and Delworth's (1982)
and
Sansbury's (1982)
propositions regarding supervision issues were applied to the supervision of supervisors in training and to counselor supervision and then tested. The doctoral-student participants consisted of beginning counselors and their supervisor trainees. Critical incidents, which were obtained after each counselor-supervision session and each supervisor-supervision session, were rated on 10 supervisory issues. Results offered limited support for Sansbury's hierarchy of supervisory issues in both supervision contexts. Although significant differences were observed between counselors and supervisors and between counselor supervision and supervisor supervision, the pattern of supervisory issues was overall more similar than dissimilar. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-0167 1939-2168 |
DOI: | 10.1037/0022-0167.38.3.342 |