Loading…

Critical Incidents in Clinical Supervision and in Supervisor Supervision: Assessing Supervisory Issues

In this naturalistic study, Loganbill, Hardy, and Delworth's (1982) and Sansbury's (1982) propositions regarding supervision issues were applied to the supervision of supervisors in training and to counselor supervision and then tested. The doctoral-student participants consisted of beginn...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of counseling psychology 1991-07, Vol.38 (3), p.342-349
Main Author: Ellis, Michael V
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In this naturalistic study, Loganbill, Hardy, and Delworth's (1982) and Sansbury's (1982) propositions regarding supervision issues were applied to the supervision of supervisors in training and to counselor supervision and then tested. The doctoral-student participants consisted of beginning counselors and their supervisor trainees. Critical incidents, which were obtained after each counselor-supervision session and each supervisor-supervision session, were rated on 10 supervisory issues. Results offered limited support for Sansbury's hierarchy of supervisory issues in both supervision contexts. Although significant differences were observed between counselors and supervisors and between counselor supervision and supervisor supervision, the pattern of supervisory issues was overall more similar than dissimilar.
ISSN:0022-0167
1939-2168
DOI:10.1037/0022-0167.38.3.342