Asymmetry in the clockwise and counterclockwise rotation of the bacterial flagellar motor

• Published in: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS 2010-07, Vol.107 (29), p.12846-12849
• Main Authors: Yuan, Junhua, Fahrner, Karen A., Turner, Linda, Berg, Howard C.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Asymmetry; Attractants; Axes of rotation; Biological Sciences; Cells; Data processing; E coli; Escherichia coli; Escherichia coli - metabolism; Escherichia coli - physiology; Escherichia coli Proteins - metabolism; Flagella; Flagella - physiology; Gene expression; Knee; Latex; Molecular Motor Proteins - metabolism; Motors; Mutation - genetics; Rotation; Speed; Standard deviation; Stators; Torque; Trajectories
• ISSN: 0027-8424; 1091-6490
• DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1007333107

Cells of Escherichia coli are able to swim up gradients of chemical attractants by modulating the direction of rotation of their flagellar motors, which spin alternately clockwise (CW) and counterclockwise (CCW). Rotation in either direction has been thought to be symmetric and exhibit the same torques and speeds. The relationship between torque and speed is one of the most important measurable characteristics of the motor, used to distinguish specific mechanisms of motor rotation. Previous measurements of the torque–speed relationship have been made with cells lacking the response regulator CheY that spin their motors exclusively CCW. In this case, the torque declines slightly up to an intermediate speed called the "knee speed" after which it falls rapidly to zero. This result is consistent with a "power-stroke" mechanism for torque generation. Here, we measure the torque–speed relationship for cells that express large amounts of CheY and only spin their motors CW. We find that the torque decreases linearly with speed, a result remarkably different from that for CCW rotation. We obtain similar results for wild-type cells by reexamining data collected in previous work. We speculate that CCW rotation might be optimized for runs, with higher speeds increasing the ability of cells to sense spatial gradients, whereas CW rotation might be optimized for tumbles, where the object is to change cell trajectories. But why a linear torque–speed relationship might be optimum for the latter purpose we do not know.