The black and white and grey of strategy

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to understand the process of strategy execution when strategy is changing. Design/methodology/approach - The paper presents studies of two companies - Unilever and Carillion - which appear to have found a solution to the generic problem - to understand the proc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of strategy and management 2010-10, Vol.3 (4), p.344
Main Authors: Campbell, Andrew, Renshaw, Phil, Engstrom, Staffan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Business plans
Decision making
Employee involvement
Executives
Food
Investments
Market segments
Planning
Product development
Strategic management
Strategic planning
Studies
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to understand the process of strategy execution when strategy is changing. Design/methodology/approach - The paper presents studies of two companies - Unilever and Carillion - which appear to have found a solution to the generic problem - to understand the process of strategy execution when strategy is changing. The broader research involved examining the strategic planning processes of more than 20 large companies. Findings - The paper gives two example solutions to a common strategy problem. The gap that often emerges between the desired strategy and the enacted strategy. The general message is that planners need to design a process that enables top managers to give strategic guidance about "grey areas" at a level of detail that matches the complexity of the products and markets in which the company competes. For many companies, this is a much lower level of detail than they are used to handling in their strategic planning processes. Research limitations/implications - A drawback is the limited number of case studies. However, the main conclusions are tautological. Practical implications - Top managers need to be much more involved in executing new strategies. By predicting where lower level managers are likely to lose focus, top managers can intervene to ensure that the strategy is followed through. Social implications - There are implications for decentralisation and empowerment. Leaders need to recognise that they should intervene in some decisions some of the time in order to correct natural biases that may derail their strategic ambitions. Originality/value - This lies in a focus on strategy execution and the role of top executives in execution.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
ISSN:1755-425X
1755-4268
DOI:10.1108/17554251011092700