Simulation of the CryoSat-2 satellite radar altimeter sea ice thickness retrieval uncertainty

• Published in: Canadian journal of remote sensing 2010-02, Vol.36 (1), p.55-67
• Main Authors: Tonboe, Rasmus T., Pedersen, Leif Toudal, Haas, Christian
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Altimeters; Ice; Marine; Oceans; Radar; Retrieval; Satellites; Scattering; Sea ice; Simulation; Snow; Studies; Thickness measurement; Uncertainty
• ISSN: 0703-8992; 1712-7971
• DOI: 10.5589/m10-027

Although it is well known that radar waves penetrate into snow and sea ice, the exact mechanisms for radar altimeter scattering and its link to the depth of the effective scattering surface from sea ice are not well known. Previously proposed mechanisms linked the snow-ice interface, i.e., the dominating scattering horizon, directly with the depth of the effective scattering surface. However, simulations using a multilayer radar scattering model show that the effective scattering surface is affected by snow-cover and ice properties. With the coming CryoSat-2 (planned launch in 2010) satellite radar altimeter, it is proposed that sea ice thickness can be derived during winter by measuring its freeboard. In this study we evaluate the radar altimeter sea ice thickness retrieval uncertainty in terms of floe buoyancy, radar penetration, and ice type distribution using both a scattering model and Archimedes' principle. The effect of the snow cover on the floe buoyancy and radar penetration and on the ice cover spatial and temporal variability is assessed from field campaign measurements in the Arctic resulting in ice thickness uncertainties of about 0.3 m for the snow depth variability and 0.3 m for the snow density variability. In addition to these well-known uncertainties, we use high-resolution RADARSAT synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data to simulate errors due to the variability of the effective scattering surface as a result of the subfootprint spatial backscatter and elevation distribution, sometimes called preferential sampling. In particular, in areas where ridges represent a significant part of the ice volume (e.g., the Lincoln Sea), the average simulated altimeter thickness estimate of 2.68 m is lower than the real average footprint thickness of 3.85 m, making preferential sampling the single most important error source. This means that the errors are large and yet manageable if the relevant quantities are known a priori. Radar altimeter ice thickness retrieval uncertainties are discussed.