Loading…

Coping appraisal and parents' intentions to inform their children about sexual abuse: a protection motivation theory analysis

This study examined the effects of the coping-appraisal components of Rogers's (1983) protection motivation theory (PMT) on parents' intentions to inform their children about sexual abuse. In a 5 × 2 factorial design, 165 mothers of elementary-school-age children read questionnaires contai...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of social and clinical psychology 1989-09, Vol.8 (3), p.304-316
Main Authors: CAMPIS, L. K, PRENTICE-DUNN, S, LYMAN, R. D
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study examined the effects of the coping-appraisal components of Rogers's (1983) protection motivation theory (PMT) on parents' intentions to inform their children about sexual abuse. In a 5 × 2 factorial design, 165 mothers of elementary-school-age children read questionnaires containing one of five coping-appraisal manipulations: (a) response-efficacy information, (b) self-efficacy information, (c) combined information, (d) threat-only information, or (e) no information. In addition, low and high response costs wére varied. Dependent measures were parents' intentions to (a) obtain a booklet with information about child sexual abuse, (b) present the information, and (c) educate children about sexual abuse. As hypothesized, main effects were found for coping appraisal and response cost. Response cost and self-efficacy differentially affected parents' intentions; self-efficacy was the more potent variable in persuading parents. High response cost significantly decreased intentions to obtain the booklet and present the information. Finally, a significant coping-appraisal × response-cost interaction revealed that minimizing response cost increased intentions to adopt the coping response through the use of a precautionary decision-making strategy.
ISSN:0736-7236
1943-2771
DOI:10.1521/jscp.1989.8.3.304