Influence of High Temperature on End-of-Season Tundra CO2 Exchange

• Published in: Ecosystems (New York) 2001-04, Vol.4 (3), p.226
• Main Authors: Mertens, Sofie, Nijs, Ivan, Heuer, Mark, Kockelbergh, Fred, Beyens, Louis, Kerckvoorde, Andy Van, Impens, Ivan
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Air temperature; Arctic environments; Autumn; Canopies; Carbon; Carbon dioxide; Climate change; Global warming; High temperature; National parks; Photosynthesis; Respiration; Taiga & tundra; Temperature effects; Terrestrial ecosystems; Terrestrial environments; Tundra; Vegetation
• ISSN: 1432-9840; 1435-0629
• DOI: 10.1007/s10021-001-0006-3

The high-arctic terrestrial environment is generally recognized as one of the world's most sensitive areas with regard to global warming. In this study, we examined the influence of an isolated warm period on net ecosystem carbon dioxide (CO^sub 2^) exchange at high latitude during autumn. Using the Free Air Temperature Increase (FATI) technique, we manipulated air, soil, and vegetation temperatures in late August in a tundra site at Zackenberg in the National Park of North and East Greenland (74°N 21°W). The consequences for gross canopy photosynthesis, canopy respiration, and belowground respiration of increasing these temperatures by approximately 2.5°C were determined with closed dynamic CO^sub 2^ exchange systems. Under current temperatures, the ecosystem acted as a net CO^sub 2^ source, releasing 19 g CO^sub 2^-C m^sup -2^ over the 14-day study period. Warm soils and senescing vegetation in autumn were unequivocally responsible for this efflux. Heating enhanced CO^sub 2^ efflux to 29 g CO^sub 2^-C m^sup -2^. This effect was attributed to a 39% increase in belowground respiration, which was the main component of the carbon (C) budget. Gross photosynthesis, on the other hand, was not affected significantly by the simulated warming. Although the aftereffects of an isolated warm period on the C balance in early winter could be significant, simulations with a simple C budget model suggest that soil carbon pools are not affected to a great extent by such a climatic disturbance. The influence on atmospheric carbon, however, appears to be significant. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]