GENDER POLICING: HARASSMENT JUDGMENTS WHEN MEN TARGET OTHER MEN

• Published in: Psychology, public policy, and law public policy, and law, 2012-05, Vol.18 (2), p.245-267
• Main Authors: Wiener, Richard L., Bennett, Sidney, Cheloha, Carrie, Nicholson, Nolt
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Female; Human; Human Males; Human Sex Differences; Judgment; Male; Person Environment Fit; Sexual Harassment; Working Conditions
• ISSN: 1076-8971; 1939-1528
• DOI: 10.1037/a0025904

This research treated the self-referencing theory, which explains judgments that perceivers make about sexual harassment complaints as a specific case of the general person-environment fit model. The research examined the effects of workplace gender distribution (situation variable) and gender of the judge (person variable) on the manner in which people determine whether male-to-male misconduct constitutes harassment. We presented the fact pattern from a litigated case to 53 female and 53 male people working in a Midwest community and varied whether the workforce was male dominated (90% men) or nearly balanced (55% men). Results showed that men exposed to a male worker who complained about another man's behavior in a male-dominated workplace used themselves as reference points and found less evidence of harassment than did those exposed to the same conduct in a balanced workplace. While women workers also showed evidence of self-referencing, the gender balance in the workplace did not influence their judgments. The results of the study show how self-referencing models can expand person-fit approaches to include explanations of harassment judgments and the need to examine systematically the role of perspective taking in the perception of sexual harassment.