Loading…
A GINECO randomized phase II trial of two capecitabine and weekly paclitaxel schedules in metastatic breast cancer
To determine whether capecitabine schedule adaptation improves the tolerability of capecitabine–paclitaxel combination therapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC), patients with anthracycline-pretreated HER2-negative MBC were randomized to either arm A (21-day cycles: capecitabine 1,000 mg/m 2 twice...
Saved in:
Published in: | Breast cancer research and treatment 2012, Vol.131 (1), p.127-135 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | To determine whether capecitabine schedule adaptation improves the tolerability of capecitabine–paclitaxel combination therapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC), patients with anthracycline-pretreated HER2-negative MBC were randomized to either arm A (21-day cycles: capecitabine 1,000 mg/m
2
twice daily, days 1–14; paclitaxel 60 mg/m
2
, days 1, 8, and 15) or arm B (28-day cycles: capecitabine 1,000 mg/m
2
twice daily, days 1–5, 8–12, and 15–19; paclitaxel 80 mg/m
2
, days 1, 8, and 15). The primary endpoint was the incidence of dose reductions or delays >1 week for grade 3/4 toxicity. Secondary endpoints were efficacy and safety. All 130 randomized patients were evaluable for safety. Dose reduction or delay for grade 3/4 toxicity occurred in 39% of patients in arm A and 34% in arm B during cycles 1–6. In arm A, there were significantly more toxicity-related dose reductions (cycles 1–6: 82 vs. 67%, respectively;
P
= 0.05) and discontinuations (29 vs. 8%, respectively). Grade 3 diarrhea occurred in 12 and 0%, respectively, and grade 3 hand-foot syndrome in 12 versus 9%, respectively (grade 4 not applicable). There were no detectable differences in efficacy. Weekday capecitabine dosing with weekly paclitaxel may improve tolerability without a detrimental effect on efficacy, and merits further evaluation in patients suited to combination chemotherapy. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0167-6806 1573-7217 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10549-011-1776-8 |