Lay Perspectives on Legal Conundrums: Impossible and Mistaken Act Cases

Criminal law remains divided on the question of whether objectivity or subjectivity should be its dominant basis. Does liability begin with an objective act or harm, or with subjective intent? In the first experiment, dealing with the conundrum of impossible act cases, the question is, Will responde...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Law and human behavior 1995-12, Vol.19 (6), p.593-608
Main Authors: Finkel, Norman J, Maloney, Stephen T, Valbuena, Monique Z, Groscup, Jennifer L
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adjudication
Bullets
Criminal Conviction
Criminal Responsibility
Cubes
Defendants
Guilty verdicts
Guns
Human
Killing
Objectivity
Right of self defense
Subjectivity
Tree stumps
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Criminal law remains divided on the question of whether objectivity or subjectivity should be its dominant basis. Does liability begin with an objective act or harm, or with subjective intent? In the first experiment, dealing with the conundrum of impossible act cases, the question is, Will respondents convict on subjective grounds (where intent to murder is clear), even when a manifest criminal act and harmful consequences are absent? The results show that they do convict, though their subjective preference moderates and even reverses with certain types of mistakes, or when the potential harm, though not the actual harm, is perceived as high. In the second experiment, dealing with mistaken act and self-defense cases, the question is, Will subjectivity be determinative, or will respondents weigh objectivity more as the mistake gets more unreasonable? The results show that objectivity is weighed heavily, as fears of a plunge into subjective waters prove groundless. Without legal guidelines, respondents navigate these conundrums by shifting their objective vs. subjective balance point, guided by good common sense.
ISSN:0147-7307
1573-661X
DOI:10.1007/BF01499376