Loading…

Ownership structure, family control, and acquisition decisions

We investigate how ownership and family control influence the decision to take part in M&As as an acquirer or as an acquired company in a sample of 777 large Continental European companies in the period 1998–2008. We find that ownership is negatively correlated with the probability of launching...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of corporate finance (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Netherlands), 2011-12, Vol.17 (5), p.1636-1657
Main Authors: Caprio, Lorenzo, Croci, Ettore, Del Giudice, Alfonso
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We investigate how ownership and family control influence the decision to take part in M&As as an acquirer or as an acquired company in a sample of 777 large Continental European companies in the period 1998–2008. We find that ownership is negatively correlated with the probability of launching a takeover bid, and family firms are less likely to make acquisitions, especially when the stake held by the family is not large enough to assure the persistence of family control. On the passive side of M&A deals, the effect of the largest shareholders' ownership on the decision to accept an acquisition proposal depends non-linearly on the voting rights they hold, and family control reduces the probability of being acquired by an unrelated party. We do not find evidence that family-controlled firms destroy wealth when they acquire other companies. Finally, we document that ownership and family control, while being negatively correlated with M&A activity, are not negatively correlated with growth in firm size. ► We analyze the relation between ownership and M&As in Continental Europe. ► Voting rights of the largest shareholder and family control decrease the propensity to acquire. ► Family control reduces the probability of being acquired by an unrelated party. ► No evidence that family firms destroy value when they acquire other companies. ► Family firms engage in fewer takeovers without negatively affecting their growth.
ISSN:0929-1199
1872-6313
DOI:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2011.09.008