EM algorithm system modeling by image-space techniques for PET reconstruction

Methodology for PET system modeling using image-space techniques in the expectation maximization (EM) algorithm is presented. The approach, applicable to both list-mode data and projection data, is of particular significance to EM algorithm implementations which otherwise only use basic system model...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IEEE transactions on nuclear science 2003-10, Vol.50 (5), p.1392-1397
Main Authors: Reader, A.J., Julyan, P.J., Williams, H., Hastings, D.L., Zweit, J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Algorithms
Cancer
Convolution
Image quality
Image reconstruction
Image resolution
Instruments
Iterative algorithms
Iterative methods
Mathematical models
Modeling
Positron emission tomography
Positrons
Projection
Studies
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Methodology for PET system modeling using image-space techniques in the expectation maximization (EM) algorithm is presented. The approach, applicable to both list-mode data and projection data, is of particular significance to EM algorithm implementations which otherwise only use basic system models (such as those which calculate the system matrix elements on the fly). A basic version of the proposed technique can be implemented using image-space convolution, in order to include resolution effects into the system matrix, so that the EM algorithm gradually recovers the modeled resolution with each update. The improved system modeling (achieved by inclusion of two convolutions per iteration) results in both enhanced resolution and lower noise, and there is often no need for regularization-other than to limit the number of iterations. Tests have been performed with simulated list-mode data and also with measured projection data from a GE Advance PET scanner, for both [/sup 18/F]-FDG and [/sup 124/I]-NaI. The method demonstrates improved image quality in all cases when compared to the conventional FBP and EM methods presently used for clinical data (which do not include resolution modeling). The benefits of this approach for /sup 124/I (which has a low positron yield and a large positron range, usually resulting in noisier and poorer resolution images) are particularly noticeable.
ISSN:0018-9499
1558-1578
DOI:10.1109/TNS.2003.817327