Tracheal Intubation in the Emergency Department: A Comparison of GlideScope® Video Laryngoscopy to Direct Laryngoscopy in 822 Intubations

• Published in: The Journal of emergency medicine 2012-04, Vol.42 (4), p.400-405
• Main Authors: Sakles, John C., MD, Mosier, Jarrod M., MD, Chiu, Stephen, BA, Keim, Samuel M., MD, MS
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: direct laryngoscopy; Emergency; Emergency Service, Hospital; Female; GlideScope; Humans; intubation; Intubation, Intratracheal - methods; Laryngoscopy - instrumentation; Laryngoscopy - methods; Male; Retrospective Studies; video laryngoscopy
• ISSN: 0736-4679; 2352-5029
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2011.05.019

Abstract Background Video laryngoscopy has, in recent years, become more available to emergency physicians. However, little research has been conducted to compare their success to conventional direct laryngoscopy. Objectives To compare the success rates of GlideScope® (Verathon Inc., Bothell, WA) videolaryngoscopy (GVL) with direct laryngoscopy (DL) for emergency department (ED) intubations. Methods This was a 24-month retrospective observational study of all patients intubated in a single academic ED with a level I trauma center. Structured data forms were completed after each intubation and entered into a continuous quality improvement database. All patients intubated in the ED with either the GlideScope® standard, Cobalt, Ranger, or traditional Macintosh or Miller laryngoscopes were included. All patients intubated before arrival were excluded. Primary analysis evaluated overall and first-attempt success rates, operator experience level, performance characteristics of GVL, complications, and reasons for failure. Results There were 943 patients intubated during the study period; 120 were excluded due to alternative management strategies. DL was used in 583 (62%) patients, and GVL in 360 (38%). GVL had higher first-attempt success (75%, p = 0.03); DL had a higher success rate when more than one attempt was required (57%, p  = 0.003). The devices had statistically equivalent overall success rates. GVL had fewer esophageal intubations (n = 1) than DL (n = 18); p = 0.005. Conclusion The two techniques performed equivalently overall, however, GVL had a higher overall success rate, and lower number of esophageal complications. In the setting of ED intubations, GVL offers an excellent option to maximize first-attempt success for airway management.