Loading…

Effect of form, placement and rate of N fertilizer, and placement of P fertilizer on wheat in Saskatchewan

On the Canadian prairies, the one-pass seeding and fertilizing no-till system is very common. However, the close proximity of the fertilizer to the seed can cause damage to the emerging seedlings due to a combination of a salt effect and/or ammonia toxicity. Manufacturers have responded by developin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Canadian journal of plant science 2010-05, Vol.90 (3), p.319-337
Main Authors: Mooleki, S.P, Malhi, S.S, Lemke, R.L, Schoenau, J.J, Lafond, G, Brandt, S, Hultgreen, G.E, Wang, H, May, W.E
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:On the Canadian prairies, the one-pass seeding and fertilizing no-till system is very common. However, the close proximity of the fertilizer to the seed can cause damage to the emerging seedlings due to a combination of a salt effect and/or ammonia toxicity. Manufacturers have responded by developing openers that allow placement of seed and fertilizer in separate bands. A 3-yr study was initiated in 2000 to determine the effect of nitrogen (N) form [urea (U) and anhydrous ammonia (AA)], placement [broadcast (Br), side-band (SB) or mid-row band (MRB)], timing (fall or spring) and rate (0 to 90 or 120 kg N ha -1 ), and phosphorus (P) placement (7 to 10 kg P ha -1 ) on plant density, seed and straw yield, seed protein content, and N uptake of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under no-till at four sites representing different agro-ecological zones in Saskatchewan. Rate of applied N had the most dominant effect on agronomic variables, while form, placement, and timing of application of N had minor effects. Generally, SB and MRB were comparable in terms of seed yield, N uptake and seed protein content. From a practical perspective, SB and MRB could be used with equal success with either U or AA. Side banding P produced responses similar to seed-placed P, except under very dry conditions where side banding was superior. In general, placement of urea in soil in a band was more effective than broadcasting, while fall banding can be less effective than spring banding.Key words: Anhydrous ammonia, N application timing, N form, N and P placement, N uptake, protein content, urea, wheat, yield
ISSN:0008-4220
1918-1833
DOI:10.4141/CJPS09075