Loading…
Nonlinear trends in real exchange rates: A panel unit root test approach
We analyze the possibility of nonlinear trend stationarity as the alternative to unit roots in 23 OECD real exchange rates, 1974–1998, by adding nonlinear time terms to the CIPS panel unit root test of Pesaran (2007). We follow a thorough bootstrapping approach and propose a technique to adjust stat...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of international money and finance 2011-12, Vol.30 (8), p.1619-1637 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | We analyze the possibility of nonlinear trend stationarity as the alternative to unit roots in 23 OECD real exchange rates, 1974–1998, by adding nonlinear time terms to the CIPS panel unit root test of
Pesaran (2007). We follow a thorough bootstrapping approach and propose a technique to adjust statistical significance for the use of multiple tests over several time trend orders. The unit root null that all real exchange rates have unit roots is rejected at better than the 0.05 level. Bootstrapped results from a procedure of
Chortareas and Kapetanios (2009) suggest that the hypothesis that all are stationary is reasonable. We argue that nonlinear trend stationarity is the most likely alternative hypothesis for at least some of the real exchange rates because: (1) the strongest CIPS rejection occurs when quadratic trends are specified; (2) nonlinear time terms are statistically significant at the 0.10 level; (3) the actual CIPS statistics are more consistent with CIPS sampling distributions from bootstrapped nonlinear trend stationary processes than from linear trend or mean stationary processes.
► We apply the CIPS test with nonlinear trends to 23 OECD real exchange rates, 1974–98. ► We use a thorough bootstrap approach to generate p-values. ► The null that all 23 rates have unit roots is rejected at the 0.05 level. ► Another test suggests it is reasonable to assume all are mean or trend stationary. ► Further evidence suggests that at least some of the trends are nonlinear. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0261-5606 1873-0639 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2011.08.005 |