Trans‐dimensional inversion of microtremor array dispersion data with hierarchical autoregressive error models

• Published in: Geophysical journal international 2012-02, Vol.188 (2), p.719-734
• Main Authors: Dettmer, Jan, Molnar, Sheri, Steininger, Gavin, Dosso, Stan E., Cassidy, John F.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Arrays; Dispersions; Earth models; Errors; Estimates; Interface waves; Inverse theory; Mathematical models; Parametrization; Probability distributions; Uncertainty
• ISSN: 0956-540X; 1365-246X
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2011.05302.x

SUMMARY This paper applies a general trans‐dimensional Bayesian inference methodology and hierarchical autoregressive data‐error models to the inversion of microtremor array dispersion data for shear wave velocity (vs) structure. This approach accounts for the limited knowledge of the optimal earth model parametrization (e.g. the number of layers in the vs profile) and of the data‐error statistics in the resulting vs parameter uncertainty estimates. The assumed earth model parametrization influences estimates of parameter values and uncertainties due to different parametrizations leading to different ranges of data predictions. The support of the data for a particular model is often non‐unique and several parametrizations may be supported. A trans‐dimensional formulation accounts for this non‐uniqueness by including a model‐indexing parameter as an unknown so that groups of models (identified by the indexing parameter) are considered in the results. The earth model is parametrized in terms of a partition model with interfaces given over a depth‐range of interest. In this work, the number of interfaces (layers) in the partition model represents the trans‐dimensional model indexing. In addition, serial data‐error correlations are addressed by augmenting the geophysical forward model with a hierarchical autoregressive error model that can account for a wide range of error processes with a small number of parameters. Hence, the limited knowledge about the true statistical distribution of data errors is also accounted for in the earth model parameter estimates, resulting in more realistic uncertainties and parameter values. Hierarchical autoregressive error models do not rely on point estimates of the model vector to estimate data‐error statistics, and have no requirement for computing the inverse or determinant of a data‐error covariance matrix. This approach is particularly useful for trans‐dimensional inverse problems, as point estimates may not be representative of the state space that spans multiple subspaces of different dimensionalities. The order of the autoregressive process required to fit the data is determined here by posterior residual‐sample examination and statistical tests. Inference for earth model parameters is carried out on the trans‐dimensional posterior probability distribution by considering ensembles of parameter vectors. In particular, vs uncertainty estimates are obtained by marginalizing the trans‐dimensional posterior distribution in