Loading…

Novel adhesive glove device (AGD) for active compression–decompression (ACD) CPR results in improved carotid blood flow and coronary perfusion pressure in piglet model of cardiac arrest

Abstract Objective ACD-CPR improves coronary and cerebral perfusion. We developed an adhesive glove device (AGD) and hypothesized that ACD-CPR using an AGD provides better chest decompression resulting in improved carotid blood flow as compared to standard (S)-CPR. Design Prospective, randomized and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Resuscitation 2012-06, Vol.83 (6), p.750-754
Main Authors: Udassi, Jai P, Udassi, Sharda, Shih, Andre, Lamb, Melissa A, Porvasnik, Stacy L, Zaritsky, Arno L, Haque, Ikram U
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Objective ACD-CPR improves coronary and cerebral perfusion. We developed an adhesive glove device (AGD) and hypothesized that ACD-CPR using an AGD provides better chest decompression resulting in improved carotid blood flow as compared to standard (S)-CPR. Design Prospective, randomized and controlled animal study. Methods Sixteen anesthetized and ventilated piglets were randomized after 3 min of untreated VF to receive either S-CPR or AGD-ACD-CPR by a PALS certified single rescuer with compressions of 100 min−1 and C:V ratio of 30:2. AGD consisted of a modified leather glove exposing the fingers and thumb. A wide Velcro patch was sewn to the palmer aspect of the glove and the counter Velcro patch was adhered to the pig's chest wall. Carotid blood flow was measured using ultrasound. Data (mean ± SD) was analyzed using one way ANOVA and unpaired t -test; p -value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Right atrial pressure (mm Hg) during the decompression phase was lower during AGD-ACD-CPR (−3.32 ± 2.0) when compared to S-CPR (0.86 ± 1.8, p = 0.0007). Mean carotid blood flow was 53.2 ± 27.1 (% of baseline blood flow in ml/min) in AGD vs. 19.1 ± 12.5% in S-CPR, p = 0.006. Coronary perfusion pressure (CPP, mm Hg) was 29.9 ± 5.8 in AGD vs. 22.7 ± 6.9 in S-CPR, p = 0.04. There was no significant difference in time to ROSC and number of epinephrine doses. Conclusion Active chest decompression during CPR using this simple and inexpensive adhesive glove device resulted in significantly better carotid blood flow during the first 2 min of CPR.
ISSN:0300-9572
1873-1570
DOI:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.12.009