'If you listen to me properly, I feel good': a qualitative examination of patient experiences of dietetic consultations

• Published in: Journal of human nutrition and dietetics 2012-06, Vol.25 (3), p.275-284
• Main Authors: Hancock, R. E. E., Bonner, G., Hollingdale, R., Madden, A. M.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: behaviour change; Biological and medical sciences; Communication; consultations; Diet; Dietetics - standards; Dietitians; Feeding. Feeding behavior; Focus Groups; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Humans; Interdisciplinary Communication; Nutrition research; Patient Compliance; patient perspective; patient preferences; Patient Satisfaction; Patient-Centered Care; patient-centred; patient-perception; Patients; Referral and Consultation; Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems
• ISSN: 0952-3871; 1365-277X
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2012.01244.x

How to cite this article: Hancock R.E.E., Bonner G., Hollingdale R. & Madden A.M. (2012) ‘If you listen to me properly, I feel good’ a qualitative examination of patient experiences of dietetic consultations. J Hum Nutr Diet. 25, 275–284 Background:  There is considerable interest in healthcare research regarding communication skills and some debate surrounding the effectiveness of a patient‐centred approach to care. Understanding patient experiences of consultations can help indicate how consultations can be modified to improve effectiveness. At present, there is little research exploring patient experience of dietetic consultations. The present study aimed to achieve a better understanding of patients’ experiences of dietetic consultations using qualitative analysis. Methods:  Patients undergoing consultations with a dietitian were invited to discuss their experience of the consultation with a research dietitian who was not involved in their care. Individual interviews and focus groups were conducted and analysed using the Framework approach. Results:  Seventeen patients participated and described their experiences of consultations, which were varied and influenced by factors such as information given (resources, explanation, repetition, consistency); their dietitian’s approach (prescriptive or nonprescriptive, use of behaviour change skills), behaviour (listening skills, body language) and appointment (expectations, involvement of the multidisciplinary team, length of time); and their own internal experience (confidence, guilt, frustration). Patients agreed that certain factors, such as good communication and rapport, receiving effective and reliable information and resources, and nonjudgmental, regular support, were important factors in creating a positive experience of their consultation. However, they differed in what they believed constituted these factors. Conclusions:  Patients like dietitians to adopt a patient‐centred approach, which might be either patient‐ or practitioner‐led, and to take account of what they wanted from consultations, adapting these to meet their individual requirements.