Loading…

Nonoccupational postexposure prophylaxis following sexual assault in industrialized low-HIV-prevalence countries: A review

Although available for over a decade, use of nonoccupational postexposure prophylaxis (nPEP) remains controversial in the United States. There are concerns over sexual assault survivors' adherence, or lack thereof, leading to increased costs without an appreciable decrease in human immunodefici...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Psychology, health & medicine health & medicine, 2012-03, Vol.17 (2), p.235-254
Main Authors: Draughon, Jessica E., Sheridan, Daniel J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Although available for over a decade, use of nonoccupational postexposure prophylaxis (nPEP) remains controversial in the United States. There are concerns over sexual assault survivors' adherence, or lack thereof, leading to increased costs without an appreciable decrease in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission. This review examines and synthesizes the available literature from the past 10 years to determine the true rates of provision and adherence to nPEP regimens in sexual assault survivors in low HIV prevalence, industrialized nations. Findings suggest that further prospective research is necessary to better understand the process of post-assault nPEP evaluation and subsequent follow-up and adherence.
ISSN:1354-8506
1465-3966
DOI:10.1080/13548506.2011.579984