Loading…
Do the sex differences play such an important role in explaining performance in spatial tasks?
► Spatial task solving processes and their relationship with performance are analysed. ► There were significant sex differences in performance, as previous studies have shown. ► The processes carried out determine participant’s efficiency in resolving the task. ► The sex variable’s explicative power...
Saved in:
Published in: | Personality and individual differences 2012-04, Vol.52 (6), p.659-663 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | ► Spatial task solving processes and their relationship with performance are analysed. ► There were significant sex differences in performance, as previous studies have shown. ► The processes carried out determine participant’s efficiency in resolving the task. ► The sex variable’s explicative power in prediction of efficient performance was null. ► Sex differences is not the variable that helps individuals to solve spatial tasks.
The largest average sex differences in cognitive performance derives from spatial tasks (Voyer, Voyer, & Bryden, 1995). Analyses performed to date have not been able to satisfactorily explain this difference in performance. Frequently, the “sex” variable is considered a causal factor. However, “sex” is a broad category that entails so many confounding factors that it is nearly impossible to consider it as a causal factor. It would be more appropriate to consider the “sex” variable like a construct that requires the analysis of the test’s cognitive requirements. This research is aimed at explaining sex differences in spatial task performance in terms of sex differences in lower-level cognitive processes. In the task at hand (SODT, Spatial Orientation Dynamic Test) we identified three processes that can be evaluated independently: Mental Rotation (MR), Spatial Orientation (SO), and Time Management (TM). The correlation between these processes was relatively low (.16 |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0191-8869 1873-3549 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.paid.2011.12.010 |