Loading…

Usefulness of Lung Impedance-Guided Pre-Emptive Therapy to Prevent Pulmonary Edema During ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and to Improve Long-Term Outcomes

Patients sustaining an ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) frequently develop pulmonary congestion or pulmonary edema (PED). We previously showed that lung impedance (LI) threshold decrease of 12% to 14% from baseline during admission for STEMI marks the onset of the transition zone f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American journal of cardiology 2012-07, Vol.110 (2), p.190-196
Main Authors: Shochat, Michael, MD, PhD, Shotan, Avraham, MD, Blondheim, David S., MD, Kazatsker, Mark, MD, Dahan, Iris, MSIT, Asif, Aya, MD, Shochat, Ilia, BSc, Rabinovich, Paul, MD, PhD, Rozenman, Yoseph, MD, Meisel, Simcha R., MD, MSc
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Patients sustaining an ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) frequently develop pulmonary congestion or pulmonary edema (PED). We previously showed that lung impedance (LI) threshold decrease of 12% to 14% from baseline during admission for STEMI marks the onset of the transition zone from interstitial to alveolar edema and predicts evolution to PED with 98% probability. The aim of this study was to prove that pre-emptive LI-guided treatment may prevent PED and improve clinical outcomes. Five hundred sixty patients with STEMI and no signs of heart failure underwent LI monitoring for 84 ± 36 hours. Maximal LI decrease throughout monitoring did not exceed 12% in 347 patients who did not develop PED (group 1). In 213 patients LI reached the threshold level and, although still asymptomatic (Killip class I), these patients were then randomized to conventional (group 2, n = 142) or LI-guided (group 3, n = 71) pre-emptive therapy. In group 3, treatment was initiated at randomization (LI = −13.8 ± 0.6%). In contrast, conventionally treated patients (group 2) were treated only at onset of dyspnea occurring 4.1 ± 3.1 hours after randomization (LI = −25.8 ± 4.3%, p
ISSN:0002-9149
1879-1913
DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.03.009