Loading…

Congenital non-central nervous system malformations in cerebral palsy: a distinct subset?

Aim  The aim of this article was to identify and contrast the subset of children with cerebral palsy (CP) and non‐central nervous system (CNS) congenital malformations with children with CP but no coexisting non‐CNS congenital malformations. Method  A population‐based regional comprehensive CP regis...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Developmental medicine and child neurology 2012-08, Vol.54 (8), p.748-752
Main Authors: SELF, LAUREN, DAGENAIS, LYNN, SHEVELL, MICHAEL
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Aim  The aim of this article was to identify and contrast the subset of children with cerebral palsy (CP) and non‐central nervous system (CNS) congenital malformations with children with CP but no coexisting non‐CNS congenital malformations. Method  A population‐based regional comprehensive CP registry was used to identify children with CP who had non‐CNS congenital malformations (n=34; 19 males, 15 females; 22 classified as Gross Motor Function Classification System [GMFCS] levels I–III, 12 as GMFCS level IV or V). Their clinical features were then compared with other children with CP without non‐CNS congenital malformations (n=207; 115 males, 92 females; 138 classified as GMFCS levels I–III, 69 as GMFCS level IV or V). Results  Children with CP and non‐CNS congenital malformations did not differ from those without in terms of neurological subtype distribution or functional severity, as measured by the GMFCS. Also, there was no association with previous maternal infections (i.e. toxoplasmosis, rubella, cytomegalovirus, herpes simplex virus 2 [TORCH]), maternal fever, use of illicit substances, asphyxia, neonatal encephalopathy, intraventricular haemorrhage, or septicaemia. The incidence of comorbidities such as convulsions, communication difficulties, gavage feeding, cortical blindness, and auditory impairment was not higher in this subgroup. Interpretation  The incidence of congenital non‐CNS malformations among children with CP is appreciable. Children with these non‐CNS malformations do not appear to differ from other children with CP regarding neurological subtype, functional severity, and comorbidities, or maternal or obstetrical factors. Thus, the specific presence of a non‐CNS congenital malformation does not appear to assist the practitioner in the management or understanding of a child’s CP. This article is commented on by Kirby on pages 677‐678 of this issue
ISSN:0012-1622
1469-8749
DOI:10.1111/j.1469-8749.2012.04309.x