Loading…

A molecular dynamics simulation study of the velocities, mobility and activation energy of an austenite–ferrite interface in pure Fe

Molecular dynamics simulations have been used to obtain the mobility, in pure Fe, of a face-centered cubic (fcc)–body-centered cubic (bcc) interphase boundary with an orientation given by (110)bcc//(776)fcc and [001]bcc//[−110]fcc. The interface is best described by a 4.04° rotation, about an axis l...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Acta materialia 2012-06, Vol.60 (10), p.4328-4335
Main Authors: Song, H., Hoyt, J.J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Molecular dynamics simulations have been used to obtain the mobility, in pure Fe, of a face-centered cubic (fcc)–body-centered cubic (bcc) interphase boundary with an orientation given by (110)bcc//(776)fcc and [001]bcc//[−110]fcc. The interface is best described by a 4.04° rotation, about an axis lying in the boundary plane, from the Nishiyama–Wasserman orientation and the boundary consists of a parallel array of steps (disconnections). An embedded atom method interatomic potential was employed to model Fe, and the free energy difference as a function of temperature between the fcc and bcc phases, which provided the driving force for boundary motion, was determined by a thermodynamic integration procedure. Although the boundary was found to be very mobile, the transformation did not proceed by a martensite mechanism. The boundary mobility was obtained for several temperatures in the range 600–1400K and Arrhenius behavior was found with an activation energy of 16.5±2.7kJmol−1 and a pre-exponential factor equal to 7.8(±0.9)×10−3mmolJ−1s−1. The activation energy is much lower than that extracted from experiments on the massive transformation in Fe alloys and possible reasons for the discrepancy are discussed.
ISSN:1359-6454
1873-2453
DOI:10.1016/j.actamat.2012.04.023