Loading…
Noradrenaline use for septic shock in children: doses, routes of administration and complications
Aim: To report our 10 year experience with noradrenaline use in children with septic shock focusing on doses, routes of administration and complications. Methods: Retrospective single‐centre review of children with septic shock who received noradrenaline between 2000 and 2010. Results: We identif...
Saved in:
Published in: | Acta Paediatrica 2012-09, Vol.101 (9), p.e426-e430 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Aim: To report our 10 year experience with noradrenaline use in children with septic shock focusing on doses, routes of administration and complications.
Methods: Retrospective single‐centre review of children with septic shock who received noradrenaline between 2000 and 2010.
Results: We identified 144 children with septic shock treated with noradrenaline, in 22% as the first‐line drug. The median volume resuscitation before vasoactive agent administration was 50 mL/kg interquartile range [IQR: 30–70]. Mean doses of noradrenaline ranged from 0.5 ± 0.4 μg/kg per min (starting dose) to 2.5 ± 2.2 μg/kg per min (maximum dose). Noradrenaline was administered via peripheral venous access or intra‐osseous route in 19% of cases for a median duration of 3 h [IQR: 2–4] without any adverse effects. The use of noradrenaline increased over the study period. Mortality rate was 45% with a significant decrease over the study period. Adverse effects included arrhythmia in two children and hypertension in eight children. None of these arrhythmias required treatment and hypertension resolved with the noradrenaline dose reduction.
Conclusion: Higher doses of noradrenaline than those suggested in the literature may be necessary to reverse hypotension and hypoperfusion. The use of noradrenaline through peripheral venous access or intra‐osseous route was safe, without any adverse effects. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0803-5253 1651-2227 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2012.02725.x |